Journal of Resources and Ecology ›› 2023, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (2): 321-330.DOI: 10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2023.02.010
• Tourism Resources and Ecotourism • Previous Articles Next Articles
WANG Dongliang1(), LIU Qiongying2, HU Shiwei1,*(
)
Received:
2022-03-01
Accepted:
2022-05-28
Online:
2023-03-30
Published:
2023-02-21
Contact:
HU Shiwei
About author:
WANG Dongliang, E-mail: wdl2022@126.com
Supported by:
WANG Dongliang, LIU Qiongying, HU Shiwei. Study on the Exploitation Potential of Ecotourism in Leshan City based on a Multi-Hierarchy Grey Method[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2023, 14(2): 321-330.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.jorae.cn/EN/10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2023.02.010
First grade indexes | Second grade indexes | Third grade indexes |
---|---|---|
Exploitation potential of ecotourism resources (V) | Conditions of tourism resources (V1) | Fauna Flora Geology and topography Air quality Climate Water body |
Conditions of tourist resource exploitation (V2) | Natural accessibility Market accessibility Traffic condition Resource composition Construction conditions Scenic area capacity Financing conditions Government policy and residents’ acceptance | |
Tourism resource exploitation benefit (V3) | Social benefit Economic benefit Environmental benefit | |
Tourism resource value (V4) | Value of science popularization and scientific research Value of ornamental and recreational features Value of ecological culture |
Table 1 Evaluation index system of ecotourism resource exploitation
First grade indexes | Second grade indexes | Third grade indexes |
---|---|---|
Exploitation potential of ecotourism resources (V) | Conditions of tourism resources (V1) | Fauna Flora Geology and topography Air quality Climate Water body |
Conditions of tourist resource exploitation (V2) | Natural accessibility Market accessibility Traffic condition Resource composition Construction conditions Scenic area capacity Financing conditions Government policy and residents’ acceptance | |
Tourism resource exploitation benefit (V3) | Social benefit Economic benefit Environmental benefit | |
Tourism resource value (V4) | Value of science popularization and scientific research Value of ornamental and recreational features Value of ecological culture |
Score | Meaning |
---|---|
1 | The same importance as the two indicators |
3 | The former is slightly more important than the latter in comparison with the two indicators |
5 | The former is more important than the latter in comparison with the two indicators |
7 | The former is much more important than the latter in comparison with the two indicators |
9 | The former is extremely important relative to the latter in comparison with the two indicators |
2, 4, 6, 8 | The intermediate values of the above adjacent judgments |
Table 2 Scores of relative importance of factors
Score | Meaning |
---|---|
1 | The same importance as the two indicators |
3 | The former is slightly more important than the latter in comparison with the two indicators |
5 | The former is more important than the latter in comparison with the two indicators |
7 | The former is much more important than the latter in comparison with the two indicators |
9 | The former is extremely important relative to the latter in comparison with the two indicators |
2, 4, 6, 8 | The intermediate values of the above adjacent judgments |
Secondary grade indexes | Index weight | Score of relative importance |
---|---|---|
Condition of tourism resources | 0.236 | 1 |
Conditions of tourist resource exploitation | 0.180 | 6 |
Tourism resource exploitation benefit | 0.236 | 1 |
Tourism resource value | 0.347 | 2 |
Table 3 Index weights of the secondary grade indicators
Secondary grade indexes | Index weight | Score of relative importance |
---|---|---|
Condition of tourism resources | 0.236 | 1 |
Conditions of tourist resource exploitation | 0.180 | 6 |
Tourism resource exploitation benefit | 0.236 | 1 |
Tourism resource value | 0.347 | 2 |
Indicators | Index weight | Score of relative importance | |
---|---|---|---|
Condition of tourism resources | Fauna | 0.080 | 8 |
Flora | 0.080 | 8 | |
Geology and topography | 0.171 | 3 | |
Air quality | 0.150 | 8 | |
Climate | 0.217 | 0 | |
Water body | 0.299 | 4 | |
Conditions of tourist resource exploitation | Natural accessibility | 0.101 | 5 |
Market accessibility | 0.101 | 5 | |
Traffic condition | 0.183 | 3 | |
Resource composition | 0.175 | 5 | |
Construction conditions | 0.101 | 5 | |
Scenic area capacity | 0.061 | 8 | |
Financing conditions | 0.055 | 6 | |
Government policy and residents’ acceptance | 0.219 | 1 | |
Tourism resource exploitation benefit | Social benefit | 0.159 | 3 |
Economic benefit | 0.251 | 8 | |
Environmental benefit | 0.588 | 9 | |
Tourism resource value | Value of science popularization and scientific research | 0.119 | 9 |
Value of ornamental and recreational features | 0.272 | 1 | |
Value of ecological culture | 0.608 | 0 |
Table 4 Index weights of the third-grade indicators
Indicators | Index weight | Score of relative importance | |
---|---|---|---|
Condition of tourism resources | Fauna | 0.080 | 8 |
Flora | 0.080 | 8 | |
Geology and topography | 0.171 | 3 | |
Air quality | 0.150 | 8 | |
Climate | 0.217 | 0 | |
Water body | 0.299 | 4 | |
Conditions of tourist resource exploitation | Natural accessibility | 0.101 | 5 |
Market accessibility | 0.101 | 5 | |
Traffic condition | 0.183 | 3 | |
Resource composition | 0.175 | 5 | |
Construction conditions | 0.101 | 5 | |
Scenic area capacity | 0.061 | 8 | |
Financing conditions | 0.055 | 6 | |
Government policy and residents’ acceptance | 0.219 | 1 | |
Tourism resource exploitation benefit | Social benefit | 0.159 | 3 |
Economic benefit | 0.251 | 8 | |
Environmental benefit | 0.588 | 9 | |
Tourism resource value | Value of science popularization and scientific research | 0.119 | 9 |
Value of ornamental and recreational features | 0.272 | 1 | |
Value of ecological culture | 0.608 | 0 |
[1] | Ding L Y. 2012. Eco-tourism resources investigation and sustainable development strategies in Pingtan. Journal of Jilin Normal University ( Natural Science Edition ), 33(1): 62-65. (in Chinese) |
[2] | Gao S, Zhao L, Sun H H, et al. 2020. Evaluation and driving force analysis of marine sustainable development based on the grey relational model and path analysis. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 11(6): 570-579. |
[3] | He F Y. 2015. Evaluation of ecotourism development potential in Western China. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 29(4): 189-194. (in Chinese) |
[4] | Hu S H. 1996. A multilevel grey evaluation method for subjective index appraisal. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 16(1): 12-20. (in Chinese) |
[5] | Jia Z Z, Luo S Q, Mao Y Q. 2015. Multi-level grey evaluation of exploration potential of Guizhou Qiandongnan Miaoling National Geo-park. Guizhou Science, 33(5): 85-90. (in Chinese) |
[6] | Leshan Municipal Local Records Compilation Committee. 2001. Leshan City Chronicle. Chengdu, China: BaShu Press. (in Chinese) |
[7] | Li Y Q. 2020. Localization and internationalization of ecotourism development in China. Tourism and Hospitality Prospects, 4(5): 1-18. |
[8] | Lü J S, Liu Y, Zhang Z L, et al. 2011. Evaluation of exploitation potential and formulation of development strategy of eco-tourism resources in coastal wetlands of northern Shandong Province. Resources Science, 33(9): 1788-1798. (in Chinese) |
[9] | Luo Y L. 2016. Potential evaluation on ecotourism resources and sustainable development strategy in Henan Province. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 37(9): 40-47. (in Chinese) |
[10] | Obua J. 1997. The potential, development and ecological impact of ecotourism in Kibale National Park, Uganda. Journal of Environmental Management, 50(1): 27-38. |
[11] | Prisken J. 2001. Assessment of natural resources for nature-based tourism: The case of the central coast region of western Australia. Tourism Management, 22(6): 637-648. |
[12] | Shi D, Yang H. 2019. Research on evaluation model of the ecotourism development potential and its empirical analysis based on the multi-level grey evaluation method. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 40(2): 40-48. (in Chinese) |
[13] | Su J B, Li X. 2019. Multi-level grey evaluation on ecotourism resources potential in Daxing’anling region. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology, 39(3): 51-57. (in Chinese) |
[14] | Taylor T K, Bandathole C. 2013. Tourism development potential of the Northern Province of Zambia. American Journal of Tourism Management, 2(1): 10-25. |
[15] | Wang X, Huang Z F, Yuan L W, et al. 2007. A study on potential assessment of ecotourism resources: A case of coastal wetlands in Yancheng. Economic Geography, 27(5): 830-834. (in Chinese) |
[16] | Wang Y R, Li L T. 2015. Exploitation evaluation of tourism resources on the basis of multilevel grey method: Taking an example of desert tourist areas of Ningxia. Ningxia Engineering Technology, 3(1): 83-88. (in Chinese) |
[17] | Zhong L S, Wang J, Tang C C. 2009. Assessing development potential of hot spring tourism resources in Tibet. Resources Science, 31(11): 1848-1855. (in Chinese) |
[1] | ZHU Anni, ZHONG Yongde, WEI Juan. Changes in Ecotourism Flow in Hunan Province of China in the Context of COVID-19 [J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2023, 14(2): 276-288. |
[2] | SHEN Hanli, ZHENG Xin, LEE Chunhung, JIA Jingbo, KHATTAK Romaan Hayat. Tourists’ Willingness to Pay for the Non-use Values of Ecotourism Resources in a National Forest Park [J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2023, 14(2): 331-343. |
[3] | TANG Chengcai, XU Shiyi. Sustainable Development of Ice and Snow Tourism—Theory & Empirical Studies: Preface [J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2022, 13(4): 547-551. |
[4] | LU Xiaobo, CHEN Xiaoying. Analysis of Obstacles to Sustainable Development of Ecotourism in Nature Reserves: A Field Investigation of Three National Na-ture Reserves in Liaoning Province [J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2020, 11(1): 50-58. |
[5] | Dhruba Bijaya G.C., BHANDARI Jyoti, XU Zengrang, LI Can. Contribution of Community Forestry in Poverty Reduction: Case Study of Multiple Community Forests of Bajhang District, Nepal [J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2019, 10(6): 632-640. |
[6] | WANG Pengwei, ZHONG Linsheng. Tourist Willingness to Pay for Protected Area Ecotourism Resources and Influencing Factors at the Hulun Lake Protected Area [J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2018, 9(2): 174-180. |
[7] | WANG Jing, ZHONG Linsheng, CHEN Tian. Ecotourism Resources Assessment and Development Strategy for Guizhou Province, China [J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2017, 8(6): 648-654. |
[8] | ZHONG Linsheng, LIU Limin. Ecotourism Development in China: Achievements, Problems and Strategies [J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2017, 8(5): 441-448. |
[9] | TANG Chengcai, ZHENG Qianqian, QIN Nana, SUN Yan, WANG Shushu, FENG Ling. A Review of Green Development in the Tourism Industry [J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2017, 8(5): 449-459. |
[10] | XIAO Lianlian, ZHONG Linsheng. Quantitative Study on the Evolution of Ecotourism Policy Development in China [J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2017, 8(5): 460-469. |
[11] | XIANG Baohui. Ecotourism Development Evaluation and Measures for Forest Parks in China [J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2017, 8(5): 470-477. |
[12] | YU Hu, ZHONG Linsheng. Influence Factors and Development Model of Regional Ecotourism Cooperation in China [J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2017, 8(5): 478-484. |
[13] | ZHANG Aiping, ZHONG Linsheng, XU Yong, DANG Lijuan, ZHOU Bin. Identifying and Mapping Wetland-based Ecotourism Areas in the First Meander of the Yellow River: Incorporating Tourist Preferences [J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2015, 6(1): 21-29. |
[14] | TANG Chengcai, ZHONG Linsheng, CHENG Shengkui. Tibetan Attitudes Towards Community Participation and Ecotourism [J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2012, 3(1): 8-15. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||