Advancement of the Qianyanzhou Mode in the New Period

doi:10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2022.03.017

Abstract

Abstract:

In the early 1980s, to control soil and water loss in the rainy season and problems of water shortages in the dry season in the red soil hilly region of central Jiangxi, the academician team of Li Wenhua from Qianyanzhou Station of the Chinese Academy of Sciences proposed a comprehensive muti-dimensional agriculture development mode known as the “Qianyanzhou Mode”. Since then, models for the forest-livestock-food ecosystem, forest-fruit-economy ecosystem, and land-water compound muti-dimensional system and others have been tested, demonstrated, promoted and used to solve major issues in ecological restoration and agricultural production. With the dawn of the new era, the Qianyanzhou Mode is being given new connotations. In order to reduce the use of pesticides and eliminate the use of antibiotics for improving the quality of agricultural products, increasing farmers' income, and assisting in strategies for rural vitalization, Qianyanzhou Station is currently focusing on the development of experiments and demonstrations of green agricultural development modes, such as forest-fruit-fowl, hybrid paper mulberry-pig-fruit, grass-sheep(cattle)-fertilizer-fruit, hybrid paper mulberry-fish-goose, paddy-shrimp, and others. The goal of this new effort is to apply the wisdom of Qianyanzhou to the construction of the ecological civilization, including ecological environment protection and the prosperity of farmers in the old revolutionary base areas in central Jiangxi Province.

Key words: hills in central Jiangxi, Qianyanzhou New Mode, green development, eco-civilization

WANG Jingsheng, CAO Kaili, LIU Wenjing, YANG Xiao. Advancement of the Qianyanzhou Mode in the New Period[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2022, 13(3): 528-536.

Figures/Tables 8

References 21

[1]	Cao C G, Jiang Y, Wang J P. 2017. “Dual character” of rice-crayfish culture and strategies for its sustainable development. Chinese Journal of Ecological Agriculture, 25(9): 1245-1253. (in Chinese)
[2]	Cheng G, Long X Q, Wang Z B, et al. 2015. Livestock manure use efficiency by earthworm taiping. Journal of Domestic Animal Ecology, 36(5): 77-80. (in Chinese)
[3]	Huang J K, Liu Y. 2010. Environmental pollution in rural China and its driving forces. Chinese Journal of Management, 7(11): 1725-1729. (in Chinese)
[4]	Jiang C Y. 2014. On establishing a new agricultural operation system. Frontiers, (1): 70-78. (in Chinese)
[5]	Jiang W, Shi Y M. 2016. Analysis on the status quo and trend of Jiangxi agriculture development. Agricultural Archaeology, (6): 257-262. (in Chinese)
[6]	Kang C W. 1993. Taihe County chronicles. Beijing, China: Party School of the CPC Central Committee. (in Chinese)
[7]	Liang W J. 2011. The study on the China's agriculture developing by converging with related industries from the visual angle of industry convergence. Science Economy Society, 29(4): 12-17, 24. (in Chinese)
[8]	Liu Q K, Zhou P G, Zhu W D, et al. 2017. Weed control efficacy and economic benefits of rice-lobster farming in paddy rice fields. Hubei Agricultural Science, 56(10): 1859-1862. (in Chinese)
[9]	Ma H, Zhong B L, Yue H, et al. 2015. Research on the application of natural ecological restoration in a typical region of China with red soils. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 35(18): 6148-6156. (in Chinese)
[10]	Ni Z B, Deng X A. 1990. Brief discussion on Jiangxi's “Qianyanzhou mode”. Jiangxi Agricultural Science and Technology, (4): 2-3. (in Chinese)
[11]	Peng Y L, Yan G Y, Ma X Y, et al. 2019. Efficiency evaluation of “silage maize + breeding” integrated mode based on emergy analysis and adjusted DEA-EBM method: Empirical evidence from Sichuan Province. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 33(12): 68-76. (in Chinese)
[12]	Planning Office (Development Planning Division of the Department of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of Jiangxi Province). 2020.Preliminary research report on the development of agricultural and rural modernization during the “14th Five-Year Plan” period in Jiangxi Province. http://nync.jiangxi.gov.cn/art/2020/9/9/art_27789_2848896.html. Viewed 9 Sep 2020. (in Chinese)
[13]	Taihe Government (Taihe County People's Government). 2020. 2020 government work report. http://www.jxth.gov.cn/news-show-47290.html. Viewed 20 Jun 2020. (in Chinese)
[14]	Tang J L, Jin S Q. 2021. Research hotspots and frontiers for the combination of planting and breeding in China-Based on literature analysis since 1998. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 42(11): 24-31. (in Chinese)
[15]	Tian S Z, Guo H H, Yao L, et al. 2018. Development analysis for fertilizer utilization of agricultural planting and animal wastes in China. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 34(S1): 123-131. (in Chinese)
[16]	Wang B Y. 2018. Bibliometric analysis and literature review of efficient eco-agriculture research. Journal of Hubei University of Economics, 16(3): 54-64, 126-127. (in Chinese)
[17]	Wang J S, Zhang S H, Wang T, et al. 2019. Characteristics analysis of nutritional components in meat of Taihe silky fowl. Journal of Economic Animal, 23(1): 23-28.
[18]	Yang F Y. 2017. Hybrid paper mulberry feed bring up “ecotype pig”. http://news.wugu.com.cn/article/971605.html. 2017-02-17. (in Chinese)
[19]	Yi F R, Lin W S, Zhang M Y. 2019. Effects of rice-hrimp co-cultivation on water environment in paddy fields. Crop Research, 33(5): 362-365, 373.
[20]	Zhang P C, Cheng D B. 2014. Interpretation on technical standards for comprehensive control of water and soil erosion in the red soil hilly region in Southern China. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 31(12): 28-34. (in Chinese)
[21]	Zou J D, Liu W J, Wang J S, et al. 2018. A study of the Qianyanzhou mode in a subtropical red soil hilly region of China. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 9(6): 654-662. DOI URL

Year	Arable land	Woodland	Orchard	Artificial grassland	Aquaculture water area	Wasteland and hills
1982	21.7	0.9	0	0.1	0.1	175.2
1988	17.8	120.7	27.3	7.1	6.0	18.3

Year	Arable land	Woodland	Orchard	Artificial grassland	Aquaculture water area	Wasteland and hills
1982	21.7	0.9	0	0.1	0.1	175.2
1988	17.8	120.7	27.3	7.1	6.0	18.3

Experimental design	Initial weight (g)	40-day weight (g)	Weight gain relative to control (%)
Conventional feed (control)	303.57	524.67	-
Conventional+15% fresh leaves	303.57	588	12.07
Conventional+15% fermented powder	303.57	592.25	12.88
Conventional+15% unfermented powder	303.57	629.21	19.92

Experimental design	Initial weight (g)	40-day weight (g)	Weight gain relative to control (%)
Conventional feed (control)	303.57	524.67	-
Conventional+15% fresh leaves	303.57	588	12.07
Conventional+15% fermented powder	303.57	592.25	12.88
Conventional+15% unfermented powder	303.57	629.21	19.92

Project		Company + farmer	Scale business households	Rice monoculture
Cash	Expense	-23.58	-23.83	-14.85
	Income	33.35	35.12	18.67
	Net income	9.77	11.29	3.82
	Cost-benefit ratio	0.01	0.02	0.01
Value of ecosystem service functions	Positive value	36.13	36.32	28.28
	Negative value	-3.29	-3.29	-4.71
	Net value	32.84	33.03	23.57
Net ecological and economic benefits		42.61	44.32	27.39
Comprehensive cost-benefit ratio		0.03	0.03	0.01