Journal of Resources and Ecology ›› 2022, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (3): 501-510.DOI: 10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2022.03.014
• Some Hot Topics in Ecology and Resources Use (Guest Editors: MIN Qingwen, SHI Peili) • Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHANG Linbo1(), HAO Chaozhi2, SONG Yang3, WANG Yiyao4,*(
), ZHANG Wentao1,*(
), HUANG Yuhua1, LIANG Tian1
Received:
2021-08-15
Accepted:
2021-11-25
Online:
2022-05-30
Published:
2022-04-18
Contact:
WANG Yiyao,ZHANG Wentao
About author:
ZHANG Linbo, E-mail: zhanglb@sdu.edu.cn
Supported by:
ZHANG Linbo, HAO Chaozhi, SONG Yang, WANG Yiyao, ZHANG Wentao, HUANG Yuhua, LIANG Tian. Basic Principles of Gross Ecosystem Product (GEP) Accounting[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2022, 13(3): 501-510.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.jorae.cn/EN/10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2022.03.014
Functional category | Costanza et al. ( | MEA ( | TEEB ( | UN ( |
---|---|---|---|---|
Ecosystem products | Food production | Food | Food | Biomass |
Raw materials | Fiber | Raw materials | Genetic material | |
Water resources | Fresh water | Water | Water supply | |
Gene resources | Genetic resources | Genetic resources | Other | |
- | Biochemicals, natural medicines, and pharmaceuticals | Medicinal resource | - | |
- | Decorative resources | Ornamental resources | - | |
Human settlement regulation | Climate regulation | Regulation of climate | Climate regulation | Global and local climate regulation |
Gas regulation | Rainfall pattern regulation Noise attenuation | |||
Pollutant and waste treatment | Waste treatment | Regulation of air quality | Air quality regulation | Air filtration |
Purification of water | Water purification | Water purification | ||
Disposal of wastes | Waste treatment | Solid waste remediation | ||
Ecological and hydrological regulation | Water regulation | Regulation of water resources | Water flow regulation | Water flow regulation |
Ecosystem disaster mitigation | Interference regulation | Regulation of natural disasters | Moderation of extreme events | Flood control Storm mitigation |
Biological control | Disease regulation | Biological prevention and control | - | |
Pest regulation | ||||
Soil erosion control | Erosion control and sediment retention | Regulation of erosion | Prevention of erosion | Soil quality regulation Soil and sediment retention |
Spiritual and cultural services | Leisure and recreation | Pastime and ecotourism | Recreation and tourism opportunity | Recreation Visual amenity |
Cultural services (arts, aesthetics, spirit, education, and science) | Aesthetic value | Aesthetic information | Education, scientific and research | |
Knowledge system | Culture, arts, and design inspiration | |||
Educational value | ||||
Inspiration | ||||
Social relations | Cognitive development information | |||
Spiritual and religious value | Spiritual experience | Spiritual, symbolic, and artistic | ||
Nostalgia complex | ||||
Traditional cultural values | ||||
Supporting services | Soil formation | Soil formation | ‒ | ‒ |
‒ | Photosynthesis | - | Nursery population and habitat | |
‒ | Primary production | ‒ | ‒ | |
Nutrient cycling | Nutrient cycling | ‒ | ‒ | |
‒ | Water cycling | - | ‒ | |
Epibiotic species reserves | - | Gene pool protection | Maintenance | |
‒ | - | Lifecycle maintenance | Biological control | |
Pollination | Pollination | Pollination | Pollination |
Table 1 Comparison of gross ecosystem product (GEP) accounting indicator systems
Functional category | Costanza et al. ( | MEA ( | TEEB ( | UN ( |
---|---|---|---|---|
Ecosystem products | Food production | Food | Food | Biomass |
Raw materials | Fiber | Raw materials | Genetic material | |
Water resources | Fresh water | Water | Water supply | |
Gene resources | Genetic resources | Genetic resources | Other | |
- | Biochemicals, natural medicines, and pharmaceuticals | Medicinal resource | - | |
- | Decorative resources | Ornamental resources | - | |
Human settlement regulation | Climate regulation | Regulation of climate | Climate regulation | Global and local climate regulation |
Gas regulation | Rainfall pattern regulation Noise attenuation | |||
Pollutant and waste treatment | Waste treatment | Regulation of air quality | Air quality regulation | Air filtration |
Purification of water | Water purification | Water purification | ||
Disposal of wastes | Waste treatment | Solid waste remediation | ||
Ecological and hydrological regulation | Water regulation | Regulation of water resources | Water flow regulation | Water flow regulation |
Ecosystem disaster mitigation | Interference regulation | Regulation of natural disasters | Moderation of extreme events | Flood control Storm mitigation |
Biological control | Disease regulation | Biological prevention and control | - | |
Pest regulation | ||||
Soil erosion control | Erosion control and sediment retention | Regulation of erosion | Prevention of erosion | Soil quality regulation Soil and sediment retention |
Spiritual and cultural services | Leisure and recreation | Pastime and ecotourism | Recreation and tourism opportunity | Recreation Visual amenity |
Cultural services (arts, aesthetics, spirit, education, and science) | Aesthetic value | Aesthetic information | Education, scientific and research | |
Knowledge system | Culture, arts, and design inspiration | |||
Educational value | ||||
Inspiration | ||||
Social relations | Cognitive development information | |||
Spiritual and religious value | Spiritual experience | Spiritual, symbolic, and artistic | ||
Nostalgia complex | ||||
Traditional cultural values | ||||
Supporting services | Soil formation | Soil formation | ‒ | ‒ |
‒ | Photosynthesis | - | Nursery population and habitat | |
‒ | Primary production | ‒ | ‒ | |
Nutrient cycling | Nutrient cycling | ‒ | ‒ | |
‒ | Water cycling | - | ‒ | |
Epibiotic species reserves | - | Gene pool protection | Maintenance | |
‒ | - | Lifecycle maintenance | Biological control | |
Pollination | Pollination | Pollination | Pollination |
No. | Basic principles | Contents included in accounting | Contents excluded from accounting |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Biological productivity | Food and raw materials directly formed by photosynthesis; services provided by biological production through improving eco-environments | Services produced by pure human labor; services produced by physicochemical processes in the natural world |
2 | Human benefits | Services producing direct benefits for humans; services reducing the costs of human protective inputs | Indirect services produced by ecosystem intermediate processes; services requiring no human protective inputs; services insensitive to human activities or free of human control |
3 | Production territoriality | Services produced by local ecosystems; global shared services | Ecosystem services produced non-locally, circulated, and transported to their destination |
4 | Current increment | Service increments of a certain period; products and services produced in the current period | Ecological resource stocks; service flows already converted to stock |
5 | Actual effectiveness | Actual services | Potential, unrealized services; services failing to meet benchmark conditions |
6 | Physical metrizability | Services with definitely measurable physical quantity | Services whose physical quantity cannot be measured; services without suitable physical quantity indicators |
7 | Data availability | Actual monitoring data available | Accounting available only in reference to empirical parameters |
8 | Harmlessness | Services beneficial or harmless to ecosystem functions; services capable of sensitively reflecting human protection, restoration, or damaging activities | Services which may harm the ecosystem bearing capacity |
Table 2 The eight basic principles and contents of GEP accounting
No. | Basic principles | Contents included in accounting | Contents excluded from accounting |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Biological productivity | Food and raw materials directly formed by photosynthesis; services provided by biological production through improving eco-environments | Services produced by pure human labor; services produced by physicochemical processes in the natural world |
2 | Human benefits | Services producing direct benefits for humans; services reducing the costs of human protective inputs | Indirect services produced by ecosystem intermediate processes; services requiring no human protective inputs; services insensitive to human activities or free of human control |
3 | Production territoriality | Services produced by local ecosystems; global shared services | Ecosystem services produced non-locally, circulated, and transported to their destination |
4 | Current increment | Service increments of a certain period; products and services produced in the current period | Ecological resource stocks; service flows already converted to stock |
5 | Actual effectiveness | Actual services | Potential, unrealized services; services failing to meet benchmark conditions |
6 | Physical metrizability | Services with definitely measurable physical quantity | Services whose physical quantity cannot be measured; services without suitable physical quantity indicators |
7 | Data availability | Actual monitoring data available | Accounting available only in reference to empirical parameters |
8 | Harmlessness | Services beneficial or harmless to ecosystem functions; services capable of sensitively reflecting human protection, restoration, or damaging activities | Services which may harm the ecosystem bearing capacity |
Value category | Subject category | Subjects to be excluded from accounting | Principles violated |
---|---|---|---|
Use values | Provisioning services | Mineral raw materials | Principle 1: No involvement of biological production action, products of long-term geological actions Principle 4: Natural resource stock, instead of current increment |
Gene resources | Principle 4: Biological resource stock formed through long-term evolution and accumulation in the natural world, instead of current increment Principle 6: Impossibility to accurately measure physical quantity or value | ||
Solar energy, tidal energy, water power generation, wind power generation | Principle 1: No involvement of biological production action | ||
Ocean shipping, inland river shipping | Principle 1: No involvement of biological production action | ||
Pleasant climate | Principle 1: No involvement of biological production action | ||
Land reclamation by flushing | Principle 1: No involvement of biological production action | ||
Sediment transport | Principle 1: No involvement of biological production action Principle 3: Produced non-locally, transported to the final destination | ||
Pelagic fishery | Principle 3: Violation of the principle of production territoriality | ||
Human inputs in agricultural product production | Principle 1: Pesticide and fertilizer inputs in agricultural product production are non-biological production inputs | ||
Regulating services | Purification of water by natural rivers and lakes | Principle 8: Violation of the principle of harmlessness, possibly harming eco systems themselves | |
Absorbance of atmospheric pollutants by plants | Principle 3: Violation of the principle of production territoriality Principle 8: Violation of the principle of harmlessness, possibly harming eco systems themselves | ||
Carbon fixation service of consumed plants | Principle 5: Grains and grasses consumed by humans and livestock are ulti mately discharged and decomposed in the form of organics, and CO2 is again released into the air; therefore, carbon fixation has failed | ||
Ecosystem cooling in the winter | Principle 5: Ecosystem cooling does not come into play in the cold winter | ||
Noise reduction | Principle 2: Noise reduction service in empty, depopulated areas produces no human benefits Principle 6: It is difficult to accurately measure the physical quantity of popula tions and the scope of the benefit by noise reduction in urban-rural areas | ||
Ecosystem disaster mitigation | Principles 6 and 7: This service is affected by many natural and human factors and cannot be scientifically quantified and assessed in most cases under current scientific and technological conditions. It is difficult to obtain relevant data | ||
Pest control | Principles 6 and 7: It is difficult to obtain data or accurately measure physical quantity or value quantity under current conditions | ||
Marine waste treatment | Principle 3: Violation of the principle of production territoriality Principle 8: Violation of the principle of harmlessness, possibly harming eco systems themselves | ||
Dissolution and absorbance of marine greenhouse gases | Principle 1: Pure physicochemical processes, no involvement of the biological production action | ||
Marine temperature regulation | Principle 1: Pure physicochemical processes, no involvement of the biological production action | ||
Cultural services | Recreational use of artificial landscapes | Principle 1: Purely artificial recreational facilities, no involvement of biological production action | |
Spiritual and religious value, inspiration, and nostalgia complex | Principle 6: It is difficult to accurately measure its physical quantity or value quantity | ||
Supporting services | Pollination | Principle 2: Ecosystem intermediate processes that do not directly benefit hu mans and ultimately serve humans through fruits | |
Soil formation | Principle 2: Soil formation provides indirect services for humans via agricul tural, forestry, and animal husbandry products Principle 4: This is a stock formed by the weathering of rocks and the long-term accumulation of organics | ||
Net primary production | Principle 2: This is either directly consumed by humans in the form of food, or indirectly utilized by humans in the form of timber, feed, industrial raw materials, or other raw materials. The portion of primary production that is directly or indirectly utilized has already been included in GEP accounting via other subjects | ||
Nutrient cycling | Principle 2: This provides indirect services for humans via agricultural, forest ry, and animal husbandry products | ||
Non-use values | Option value | Down payment made voluntarily to retain an ecosystem service | Principle 6: This has not actually occurred and should be excluded from GEP accounting |
Existence value | Payment made voluntarily to ensure the existence of ecosystem services, including bequest value | Principle 4: Stock formed on a long-term basis in the natural world Principle 6: Confirmation of service value via willingness to pay; high subjective willingness results in the non-reproducibility, incomparability, and weak applicability of GEP accounting results |
Table 3 Common subjects to be excluded from GEP accounting
Value category | Subject category | Subjects to be excluded from accounting | Principles violated |
---|---|---|---|
Use values | Provisioning services | Mineral raw materials | Principle 1: No involvement of biological production action, products of long-term geological actions Principle 4: Natural resource stock, instead of current increment |
Gene resources | Principle 4: Biological resource stock formed through long-term evolution and accumulation in the natural world, instead of current increment Principle 6: Impossibility to accurately measure physical quantity or value | ||
Solar energy, tidal energy, water power generation, wind power generation | Principle 1: No involvement of biological production action | ||
Ocean shipping, inland river shipping | Principle 1: No involvement of biological production action | ||
Pleasant climate | Principle 1: No involvement of biological production action | ||
Land reclamation by flushing | Principle 1: No involvement of biological production action | ||
Sediment transport | Principle 1: No involvement of biological production action Principle 3: Produced non-locally, transported to the final destination | ||
Pelagic fishery | Principle 3: Violation of the principle of production territoriality | ||
Human inputs in agricultural product production | Principle 1: Pesticide and fertilizer inputs in agricultural product production are non-biological production inputs | ||
Regulating services | Purification of water by natural rivers and lakes | Principle 8: Violation of the principle of harmlessness, possibly harming eco systems themselves | |
Absorbance of atmospheric pollutants by plants | Principle 3: Violation of the principle of production territoriality Principle 8: Violation of the principle of harmlessness, possibly harming eco systems themselves | ||
Carbon fixation service of consumed plants | Principle 5: Grains and grasses consumed by humans and livestock are ulti mately discharged and decomposed in the form of organics, and CO2 is again released into the air; therefore, carbon fixation has failed | ||
Ecosystem cooling in the winter | Principle 5: Ecosystem cooling does not come into play in the cold winter | ||
Noise reduction | Principle 2: Noise reduction service in empty, depopulated areas produces no human benefits Principle 6: It is difficult to accurately measure the physical quantity of popula tions and the scope of the benefit by noise reduction in urban-rural areas | ||
Ecosystem disaster mitigation | Principles 6 and 7: This service is affected by many natural and human factors and cannot be scientifically quantified and assessed in most cases under current scientific and technological conditions. It is difficult to obtain relevant data | ||
Pest control | Principles 6 and 7: It is difficult to obtain data or accurately measure physical quantity or value quantity under current conditions | ||
Marine waste treatment | Principle 3: Violation of the principle of production territoriality Principle 8: Violation of the principle of harmlessness, possibly harming eco systems themselves | ||
Dissolution and absorbance of marine greenhouse gases | Principle 1: Pure physicochemical processes, no involvement of the biological production action | ||
Marine temperature regulation | Principle 1: Pure physicochemical processes, no involvement of the biological production action | ||
Cultural services | Recreational use of artificial landscapes | Principle 1: Purely artificial recreational facilities, no involvement of biological production action | |
Spiritual and religious value, inspiration, and nostalgia complex | Principle 6: It is difficult to accurately measure its physical quantity or value quantity | ||
Supporting services | Pollination | Principle 2: Ecosystem intermediate processes that do not directly benefit hu mans and ultimately serve humans through fruits | |
Soil formation | Principle 2: Soil formation provides indirect services for humans via agricul tural, forestry, and animal husbandry products Principle 4: This is a stock formed by the weathering of rocks and the long-term accumulation of organics | ||
Net primary production | Principle 2: This is either directly consumed by humans in the form of food, or indirectly utilized by humans in the form of timber, feed, industrial raw materials, or other raw materials. The portion of primary production that is directly or indirectly utilized has already been included in GEP accounting via other subjects | ||
Nutrient cycling | Principle 2: This provides indirect services for humans via agricultural, forest ry, and animal husbandry products | ||
Non-use values | Option value | Down payment made voluntarily to retain an ecosystem service | Principle 6: This has not actually occurred and should be excluded from GEP accounting |
Existence value | Payment made voluntarily to ensure the existence of ecosystem services, including bequest value | Principle 4: Stock formed on a long-term basis in the natural world Principle 6: Confirmation of service value via willingness to pay; high subjective willingness results in the non-reproducibility, incomparability, and weak applicability of GEP accounting results |
[1] | Coffin A W, Swett R A, Cole Z D. 2013. A spatial analysis of cultural ecosystem service valuation by regional stakeholders in Florida-A coastal application of the social values for ecosystem services (SolVES) tool. EDIS, (2): 95-100. |
[2] |
Costanza R, d'Arge R, de Groot R, et al. 1997. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387(6630): 253-260.
DOI URL |
[3] |
Costanza R, de Groot R, Braat L, et al. 2017. Twenty years of ecosystem services: How far have we come and how far do we still need to go? Ecosystem Services, 28: 1-16.
DOI URL |
[4] | Dolkar P, Xiao Y, Ouyang Z Y, et al. 2017. Gross ecosystem product accounting for the Garzê Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 37(19): 6302-6312. (in Chinese) |
[5] |
Fisher B, Turner R K, Morling P. 2009. Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecological Economics, 68(3): 643-653.
DOI URL |
[6] | Fu B J, Yu D D, Lv N. 2017. An indicator system for biodiversity and ecosystem services evaluation in China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 37(2): 341-348. (in Chinese) |
[7] | Gao Y N, Zhang L B, Li K, et al. 2019. An indicator system for estimating ecosystem values. Research of Environmental Sciences, 32(1): 59-65. (in Chinese) |
[8] | Hu T, Li Y F, Huang P, et al. 2018. Comprehensive assessment of regional species conservation and updating services. Research of Environmental Science, 31(12): 2112-2123. (in Chinese) |
[9] | IPBES (Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services). 2013. Report of the first session of the plenary of the intergovernmental science-policy platform on biodiversity and ecosystem services. Bonn, Germany: IPBES Secretariat. |
[10] | Liu Y, Li C M, Sun Q Y, et al. 2019. Quantification and valuation of water supply ecosystem service in Xiamen City, China. Research of Environmental Science, 32(12): 2008-2014. (in Chinese) |
[11] | Ma G F, Yu F, Wang J N, et al. 2017. Measuring gross ecosystem product (GEP) of 2015 for terrestrial ecosystems in China. China Environmental Science, 37(4): 1243-1254. (in Chinese) |
[12] | MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment). 2005. Ecosystems and human wellbeing:synthesis. Washington DC, USA: Island Press. |
[13] | Mitchell R C, Carson R T. 1989. Using surveys to value public goods:The contingent valuation method. Washington DC, USA: RFF. |
[14] |
Müller F, Burkhard B. 2012. The indicator side of ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services, 1(1): 26-30.
DOI URL |
[15] |
Ouyang Z Y, Song C S, Zheng H, et al. 2020. Using gross ecosystem product (GEP) to value nature in decision making. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 117(25): 14593-14601.
DOI URL |
[16] | Ouyang Z Y, Zhu C Q, Yang G B, et al. 2013. Gross ecosystem product: Concept, accounting framework and case study. Acta Ecological Sinica, 33(21): 6747-6761. (in Chinese) |
[17] | TEEB (The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity). 2010. The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: Ecological and economic foundations. London, UK: Earthscan Ltd. |
[18] | UN (United Nations). 2021. System of environmental economic accounting-ecosystem accounting (SEEA-EA). New York, USA: United Nations. |
[19] | USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency). 2009. Valuing the protection of ecological systems and services. Washington DC, USA: United States Environmental Protection Agency. |
[20] | Xie G D, Lu C X, Cheng S K. 2001. Progress in evaluating the global ecosystem services. Resources Science, 23(6): 5-9. (in Chinese) |
[21] | Xie G D, Zhang C X, Zhang L M, et al. 2015. Improvement of the evaluation method for ecosystem service value based on per unit area. Journal of Natural Resources, 30(8): 1243-1254. (in Chinese) |
[22] | Zhang L B, Gao Y N. 2020. Gross ecosystem product accounting and operational system-A case study of Xiamen. Beijing, China: Science Press. (in Chinese) |
[23] | Zhang L B, Yu H Y, Hao C Z, et al. 2021. Redefinition and connotation analysis of ecosystem product. Research of Environmental Science, 34 (3): 655-660. (in Chinese) |
[24] | Zhang L B, Yu H Y, Li D Q, et al. 2019. Connotation and value implementation mechanism of ecological products. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Machinery, 50(6): 173-183. (in Chinese) |
[25] | Zhang Y M. 2012. Some basic issues in ecosystem services research. Resources Science, 34(4): 725-733. (in Chinese) |
[1] | ZHANG Biao, SHI Yunting, WANG Shuang. A Review on the Driving Mechanisms of Ecosystem Services Change [J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2022, 13(1): 68-79. |
[2] | XIE Hualin, CHEN Qianru. Land Use and Ecological Civilization: A Collection of Empirical Studies [J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2021, 12(2): 137-142. |
[3] | FENG Yanyun, ZHAO Yuluan, YANG Zhimou, XUE Chaolang, LIU Yan. Spatio-temporal Differentiation of Trade-offs and Synergies of Ecosystem Services in Typical Mountain Areas of China [J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2021, 12(2): 268-279. |
[4] | CAI Shizhen, ZHANG Xuliang, CAO Yinghui, ZHANG Zhaohui, WANG Wei. Values of the Farmland Ecosystem Services of Qingdao City, China, and their Changes [J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2020, 11(5): 443-453. |
[5] | GAO Min, XIAO Yan, HU Yunfeng. Evaluation of Water Yield and Soil Erosion in the Three-River-Source Region under Different Land-Climate Sce-narios [J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2020, 11(1): 13-26. |
[6] | ZHEN Lin, XU Zengrang, ZHAO Yuan, WANG Jijun, HU Yunfeng, WANG Juanle. Ecological Carrying Capacity and Green Development in the “Belt and Road” Initiative Region [J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2019, 10(6): 569-573. |
[7] | ZHANG Changshun, ZHEN Lin, LIU Chunlan, LIANG Yihang. Research on the Patterns and Evolution of Ecosystem Service Consumption in the “Belt and Road” [J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2019, 10(6): 621-631. |
[8] | LIANG Yihang, ZHEN Lin, JIA Mengmeng, HU Yunfeng, ZHANG Changshun, LUO Qi. Consumption of Ecosystem Services in Laos [J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2019, 10(6): 641-648. |
[9] | BAO Yingshuang,CHENG Leilei,LU Qi. Assessment of Desert Ecological Assets and Countermeasures for Ecological Compensation [J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2019, 10(1): 56-62. |
[10] | LIN Yongsheng,GUO Zhixin,ZHENG Yaomin,ZHANG Lirong,HUANG Huabing. Net Horizontal Payments for Ecosystem Services: An Application in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region of China [J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2019, 10(1): 63-68. |
[11] | DU Wenpeng, YAN Huimin, YANG Yanzhao, LIU Fang. Evaluation Methods and Research Trends for Ecological Carrying Capacity [J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2018, 9(2): 115-124. |
[12] | WANG Mingkuan, MO Hongwei. The Impact of Spatial Heterogeneity on Ecosystem Service Value in a Case Study in Liuyang River Basin, China [J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2018, 9(2): 209-217. |
[13] | ZHAO Zhilong, WU Xue, ZHANG Yili, GAO Jungang. Assessment of Changes in the Value of Ecosystem Services in the Koshi River Basin, Central High Himalayas Based on Land Cover Changes and the CA-Markov Model [J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2017, 8(1): 67-76. |
[14] | Krittika Roy. Human Response to Degradation of Ecosystems [J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2016, 7(4): 261-268. |
[15] | SUN Xueping, WANG Bin, LIU Moucheng, LIU Weiwei. The Ecosystem Service Function of Shandong Xiajin Yellow River Ancient Mulberry Trees System and Its Effect on Regional Ecosystem [J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2016, 7(3): 223-230. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||