Journal of Resources and Ecology ›› 2021, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (6): 766-776.DOI: 10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2021.06.005
• Ecological Restoration in Altay Region • Previous Articles Next Articles
LIU Hanchu1(), FAN Jie1,2,3,*(
), LIU Baoyin1, WANG Li1, QIAO Qin1
Received:
2021-02-09
Accepted:
2021-05-05
Online:
2021-11-30
Published:
2022-01-30
Contact:
FAN Jie
About author:
LIU Hanchu, E-mail: liuhanc521@sina.com
Supported by:
LIU Hanchu, FAN Jie, LIU Baoyin, WANG Li, QIAO Qin. Practical Exploration of Ecological Restoration and Management of the Mountains-Rivers-Forests-Farmlands-Lakes-Grasslands System in the Irtysh River Basin in Altay, Xinjiang[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2021, 12(6): 766-776.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.jorae.cn/EN/10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2021.06.005
Target | Index | Current value | Target value |
---|---|---|---|
The ecological health of the “two rivers and one lake” has improved significantly | Water quality of the Irtysh River | Reach or better than class III | Not degenerate |
Water quality of Ulungur River | Reach or better than class III | Not degenerate | |
Ecological water replenishment of Ulungur Lake (average for many years) (×108 m3) | 5.51 | 8 | |
Water quality of Ulungur Lake | Reach or better than class III | Not degenerate | |
The ecological service functions of Altai Mountain have been significantly improved | Comprehensive management area of mine environment (km2) | 9.4015 | 50.46 |
Forest cover rate (%) | 22.65 | 22.76 | |
Forest stock volume (×108 m3) | 1.16 | 1.17 | |
Returning farmland to forest area (×104 mu)* | 47.97 | 56.77 | |
Soil erosion control rate (%) | 14.8 | 16 | |
The ecological well-being of farmers and herdsmen has greatly improved | Living environment improvement village (unit) | - | 190 |
Recovery rate of waste mulch film in farmland (%) | 60 | ≥80 | |
Newly improved and restored area of degraded grassland (×104 mu)* | - | 75 | |
Water quality compliance rate of centralized drinking water sources (%) | ≥90 | 100 | |
Grassland comprehensive vegetation coverage (%) | 38.8 | 42.2 | |
The ecological risk of human activities is significantly reduced | Centralized treatment rate of urban sewage (%) | 51.79 | 98 |
Centralized disposal rate of domestic waste (%) | 19.2 | 100 | |
Compliance rate of the Irtysh River into the river section (%) | 100 | 100 | |
Ecological migration/household | - | 413 | |
Effective protection of the ecological safety of the Silk Road | Natural wetland protection rate (%) | 49 | 55 |
Ecological environment monitoring and early warning capabilities | Initially available | Significantly improved | |
Water quality of the section going abroad | Class II | Class II | |
Construction of national ecological civilization demonstration zone | Started | Completed |
Table 1 Performance indicators of the ecological protection and restoration of the MRFFLGs pilot
Target | Index | Current value | Target value |
---|---|---|---|
The ecological health of the “two rivers and one lake” has improved significantly | Water quality of the Irtysh River | Reach or better than class III | Not degenerate |
Water quality of Ulungur River | Reach or better than class III | Not degenerate | |
Ecological water replenishment of Ulungur Lake (average for many years) (×108 m3) | 5.51 | 8 | |
Water quality of Ulungur Lake | Reach or better than class III | Not degenerate | |
The ecological service functions of Altai Mountain have been significantly improved | Comprehensive management area of mine environment (km2) | 9.4015 | 50.46 |
Forest cover rate (%) | 22.65 | 22.76 | |
Forest stock volume (×108 m3) | 1.16 | 1.17 | |
Returning farmland to forest area (×104 mu)* | 47.97 | 56.77 | |
Soil erosion control rate (%) | 14.8 | 16 | |
The ecological well-being of farmers and herdsmen has greatly improved | Living environment improvement village (unit) | - | 190 |
Recovery rate of waste mulch film in farmland (%) | 60 | ≥80 | |
Newly improved and restored area of degraded grassland (×104 mu)* | - | 75 | |
Water quality compliance rate of centralized drinking water sources (%) | ≥90 | 100 | |
Grassland comprehensive vegetation coverage (%) | 38.8 | 42.2 | |
The ecological risk of human activities is significantly reduced | Centralized treatment rate of urban sewage (%) | 51.79 | 98 |
Centralized disposal rate of domestic waste (%) | 19.2 | 100 | |
Compliance rate of the Irtysh River into the river section (%) | 100 | 100 | |
Ecological migration/household | - | 413 | |
Effective protection of the ecological safety of the Silk Road | Natural wetland protection rate (%) | 49 | 55 |
Ecological environment monitoring and early warning capabilities | Initially available | Significantly improved | |
Water quality of the section going abroad | Class II | Class II | |
Construction of national ecological civilization demonstration zone | Started | Completed |
[1] |
Borrelli P, Robinson D A, Fleischer L R, et al. 2017. An assessment of the global impact of 21st century land use change on soil erosion. Nature Communications, 8(1): 1-13.
DOI URL |
[2] | Cheng J, You Z. 2019. Scientific connotation and practical paths about the principle of “taking mountains, rivers, forests, farmlands, lakes, and grasslands as a life community”. China Population, Resources and Environment, 29(2): 1-6. (in Chinese) |
[3] | Fan J, Wang Y F, Wang C S, et al. 2019. Reshaping the sustainable geographical pattern: A major function zoning model and its applications in China. Earth’s Future, 7: 25-42. |
[4] | Fu B. 2021. Several key points in territorial ecological restoration. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 36(1): 64-69. (in Chinese) |
[5] | Fu Q, Li B, Yang L L, et al. 2016. Importance evaluation of typical ecosystem services in arid regions of northwest China: A case study in Altay Prefecture. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 30(10): 70-75. (in Chinese) |
[6] |
Gao J X, Zou C X, Zhang K, et al. 2020. The establishment of Chinese ecological conservation redline and insights into improving international protected areas. Journal of Environmental Management, 264: 110505. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110505.
DOI URL |
[7] | Ge L Q, Li S M, Xie G D, et al. 2016. The population carrying capacity of waters ecosystem in China. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 7(1): 21-27. |
[8] | Huang L, Zheng Y H, Xiao T. 2018. Regional differentiation of ecological conservation and its zonal suitability at the county level in China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 28(1): 46-58. |
[9] | Kong L, Zheng H, Ouyang Z. 2019. Ecological protection and restoration of forest, wetland, grassland and cropland based on the perspective of ecosystem services: A case study in Dongting Lake Watershed. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 39(23): 8903-8910. (in Chinese) |
[10] | Krittika R. 2016. Human response to degradation of ecosystems. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 7(4): 261-268. |
[11] | Li J L, Lu X F, Zhang J J, et al. 2019a. The current status, problems and prospects of researches on the carrying capacities of ecological environment in China. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 10(6): 605-613. |
[12] | Li X, Wu K, Liu Y, et al. 2019b. Ecological protection and restoration of mountains-rivers-forests-farmlands-lakes-grasslands based on ecosystem services—Utilizing Heshan Section of the south Taihang area as an example. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 39(23): 8806-8816. (in Chinese) |
[13] |
Liu J G, Bawa K S, Seager T P, et al. 2019a. On knowledge generation and use for sustainability. Nature Sustainability, 2(2): 80-82.
DOI URL |
[14] | Liu J G, Diamond J. 2005. China’s environment in a globalizing world. Nature, 435(7046): 1179-1186. |
[15] | Liu S, Liu L, Zhang J, et al. 2019b. Study on ecological protection and restoration path of arid area based on improvement of ecosystem service capability: A case of the ecological protection and restoration pilot project area in Irtysh River Basin. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 39(23): 8998-9007. (in Chinese) |
[16] | Luo M, Yu E, Zhou Y, et al. 2019a. Distribution and technical strategies of ecological protection and restoration projects for mountains-rivers- forests-farmlands-lakes-grasslands. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 39(23): 8692-8701. (in Chinese) |
[17] | Luo M, Zhou Y, Ju Z, et al. 2019b. Technological model and benefit pre-evaluation of eco-environmental rehabilitation engineering of typical mines in the Nanling area of Northern Guangdong Province under the pilot framework of the eco-restoration of mountains-rivers-forests- farmlands-lakes-grassland. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 39(23): 8911-8919. (in Chinese) |
[18] | Niu Y, Hu X Z, Wang L J, et al. 2019. Ideas and practice of ecological protection and restoration of mountain-river-forest-farmland-lake-grassland system in Fuxian Lake Basin. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology, 9(5): 482-490. (in Chinese) |
[19] | Peng J, Liu D, ZHang T, et al. 2019. Systematic cognition of ecological protection and restoration of mountains-rivers-forests-farmlands-lakes- grasslands. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 39(23): 8755-8762. (in Chinese) |
[20] | Shao Q Q, Fan J W, Liu J Y, et al. 2017. Approaches for monitoring and assessment of ecological benefits of the National Key Ecological Projects. Advances in Earth Science, 32(11): 1174-1182. (in Chinese) |
[21] | Tu C Y, Suweis S, D’Odorico P. 2019. Impact of globalization on the resilience and sustainability of natural resources. Nature Sustainability, 2(4): 283-289. |
[22] | Wang B, Wang X, Zhang X. 2018. Connotations, characteristics and practice paths about the idea of taking mountains, rivers, forests, farmlands, lakes, and grasslands as a life community based on Chengde City in Hebei Province. Environmental Protection, 46(7): 60-63. (in Chinese) |
[23] | Wang M, Huang Y. 2015. China’s environmental pollution and economic growth. China Economic Quarterly, 14(2): 557-578. (in Chinese) |
[24] | Wang X L, Fan G, Liu P. 2009. Transformation of growth pattern and growth sustainability in China. Economic Research Journal, 44(1): 4-16. (in Chinese) |
[25] | Wunder S, Brouwer R, Engel S, et al. 2018. From principles to practice in paying for nature’s services. Nature Sustainability, 1(3): 145-150. |
[26] | Xu F, Wang Y, Zhang N, et al. 2014. Advances in the assessment of river ecological restoration. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 23(3): 515-520. (in Chinese) |
[27] |
You C M, Wu F Z, Yang W Q, et al. 2017. The National Key Forestry Ecology Project has changed the zonal pattern of forest litter production in China. Forest Ecology and Management, 399: 37-46.
DOI URL |
[28] |
Yu D Y, Qiao J M, Shi P J. 2018. Spatiotemporal patterns, relationships, and drivers of China’s agricultural ecosystem services from 1980 to 2010: A multiscale analysis. Landscape Ecology, 33(4): 575-595.
DOI URL |
[29] |
Zhao J K, Li L X, Zhang A S, et al. 2017. A new approach for the health assessment of river systems based on interconnected water system networks. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 8(3): 251-257.
DOI URL |
[30] | Zhao W T, Wang S T, Xu H. 2019. The conception of comprehensive harnessing measures of mountain, water, forest, field, lake and grassland based on conservation of water resources in Xiongan New Area. Forestry and Ecological Sciences, 34(1): 1-14. (in Chinese) |
[31] |
Zhou K, Wu J X, Liu H C. 2021. Spatiotemporal variations and determinants of water pollutant discharge in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China: A spatial econometric analysis. Environmental Pollution, 271: 116320. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.116320.
DOI URL |
[1] | REN Guoping, LIU Liming, LI Hongqing, SUN Qian, YIN Gang, WAN Beiqi. Geographical Impact and Ecological Restoration Modes of the Spatial Differentiation of Rural Social-Ecosystem Vulnerability: Evidence from Qingpu District in Shanghai [J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2021, 12(6): 849-868. |
[2] | WEI Yunjie, ZHEN Lin, DU Bingzhen. Effects of Grassland Restoration Approaches in Different Major Function-oriented Zones of the Headwater Region of the Yellow River in China [J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2020, 11(2): 150-158. |
[3] | Casey D. SULLIVAN, CHEN Pengju, Justine Shanti ALEXANDER, BAI Defeng, SHI Kun. Conflict on the Range: Evaluating Driving Factors of Attitudes Toward Prey Species in Qilianshan [J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2018, 9(5): 554-565. |
[4] | ZHEN Lin, YAN Huimin, HU Yunfeng, XUE Zhichao, XIAO Yu, XIE Gaodi, MA Jianxia, WANG Jijun. Overview of Ecological Restoration Technologies and Evaluation Systems [J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2017, 8(4): 315-324. |
[5] | LIU Li, CHANG Qian, JIANG Zhide. Study on Identification Methods for Ecological Technologies [J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2017, 8(4): 332-340. |
[6] | ZHU Hejian. Ecological Restoration Strategies in Fragile Subtropical Mountain Ecosystems in China Based on Long-term Research in Changting County [J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2015, 6(3): 139-145. |
[7] | Myriam JANSEN-VERBEKE, Bob McKERCHER. Reflections on the Myth of Tourism Preserving “Traditional” Agricultural Landscapes [J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2013, 4(3): 242-249. |
[8] | XIE Dong, ZHOU Hengjie, JI Haiting, AN Shuqing. Ecological Restoration of Degraded Wetlands in China [J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2013, 4(1): 63-69. |
[9] | HU Zhenqi, WANG Peijun, LI Jing. Ecological Restoration of Abandoned Mine Land in China [J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2012, 3(4): 289-296. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||