Journal of Resources and Ecology ›› 2021, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (2): 214-224.DOI: 10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2021.02.008
• Land Use Change and Land Multifunction Tradeoffs • Previous Articles Next Articles
TU Xiaosong1, SUN Qiurong2, XU Guoliang1, WU Xiaofang1
Received:
2020-08-20
Accepted:
2020-11-01
Online:
2021-03-30
Published:
2021-05-30
About author:
TU Xiaosong, E-mail: tuxiaosong@jxufe.edu.cn
Supported by:
TU Xiaosong, SUN Qiurong, XU Guoliang, WU Xiaofang. Functional Transformation of Rural Homesteads: A Field Survey of Poyang County, Jiangxi Province, China[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2021, 12(2): 214-224.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.jorae.cn/EN/10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2021.02.008
Primary index | Index description |
---|---|
Population capability function | A1: Total number of households |
A2: Number of permanent residents | |
A3: Number of households involved in work | |
A4: Total number of family support | |
A5: Comprehensive score of family education (Below primary school, 0; primary school, 5; junior high school, 15; senior high school, 20; college and above, 25) | |
Asset function | B1: Total cost of building a house |
B2: Floor area of the house | |
B3: Service life of the house | |
Residential function | C1: Floor number and building structure (Civil, 5; brick wood, 10; brick concrete, 20; frame, 40) |
C2: House interior floor, doors and windows, interior walls (Floor: soil, 5; concrete, 10; tile floor, 20; doors and windows: wood, 5; metal, 10; other, 20; interior wall: no or soil, 5; lime or imitation porcelain, 10; wall paint or other, 20) | |
C3: Availability of household tap water and flush toilets (Sanitary conditions: independent kitchen, 10; tap water, 10; flush toilet, 10; independent septic tank, 10) | |
C4: Home TV, network communication conditions (Wireless satellite, 5; cable analog, 10; cable digital, 15; network TV, 20) |
Table 1 Functional indicator system of rural homestead
Primary index | Index description |
---|---|
Population capability function | A1: Total number of households |
A2: Number of permanent residents | |
A3: Number of households involved in work | |
A4: Total number of family support | |
A5: Comprehensive score of family education (Below primary school, 0; primary school, 5; junior high school, 15; senior high school, 20; college and above, 25) | |
Asset function | B1: Total cost of building a house |
B2: Floor area of the house | |
B3: Service life of the house | |
Residential function | C1: Floor number and building structure (Civil, 5; brick wood, 10; brick concrete, 20; frame, 40) |
C2: House interior floor, doors and windows, interior walls (Floor: soil, 5; concrete, 10; tile floor, 20; doors and windows: wood, 5; metal, 10; other, 20; interior wall: no or soil, 5; lime or imitation porcelain, 10; wall paint or other, 20) | |
C3: Availability of household tap water and flush toilets (Sanitary conditions: independent kitchen, 10; tap water, 10; flush toilet, 10; independent septic tank, 10) | |
C4: Home TV, network communication conditions (Wireless satellite, 5; cable analog, 10; cable digital, 15; network TV, 20) |
Transformation type | Variable | Index description |
---|---|---|
Population capability function | X1 | Changes in the total number of households |
X2 | Changes in the number of permanent residents | |
X3 | Changes in the number of households involved in work | |
X4 | Changes in the total number of family support | |
X5 | Changes in comprehensive education level of family education | |
Asset function | X6 | Changes in all-in cost of building house |
X7 | Changes in housing construction area | |
X8 | Changes in the service life of the house | |
Residential function | X9 | Changes in building structure and floor numbers |
X10 | Changes in indoor doors, windows, and other housing decoration | |
X11 | Changes in the availability of household sanitary facilities such as tap water and flushing toilets | |
X12 | Changes in information conditions such as television and network communications |
Table 2 Rural homestead functional transformation index system
Transformation type | Variable | Index description |
---|---|---|
Population capability function | X1 | Changes in the total number of households |
X2 | Changes in the number of permanent residents | |
X3 | Changes in the number of households involved in work | |
X4 | Changes in the total number of family support | |
X5 | Changes in comprehensive education level of family education | |
Asset function | X6 | Changes in all-in cost of building house |
X7 | Changes in housing construction area | |
X8 | Changes in the service life of the house | |
Residential function | X9 | Changes in building structure and floor numbers |
X10 | Changes in indoor doors, windows, and other housing decoration | |
X11 | Changes in the availability of household sanitary facilities such as tap water and flushing toilets | |
X12 | Changes in information conditions such as television and network communications |
Criterion layer | Weight | Index layer | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Population capability function | 0.306 | X1 | 0.193 |
X2 | 0.196 | ||
X3 | 0.233 | ||
X4 | 0.197 | ||
X5 | 0.181 | ||
Asset function | 0.317 | X6 | 0.389 |
X7 | 0.327 | ||
X8 | 0.284 | ||
Residential function | 0.377 | X9 | 0.290 |
X10 | 0.215 | ||
X11 | 0.244 | ||
X12 | 0.251 |
Table 3 Summary of weights of indicators for functional transformation of rural homestead
Criterion layer | Weight | Index layer | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Population capability function | 0.306 | X1 | 0.193 |
X2 | 0.196 | ||
X3 | 0.233 | ||
X4 | 0.197 | ||
X5 | 0.181 | ||
Asset function | 0.317 | X6 | 0.389 |
X7 | 0.327 | ||
X8 | 0.284 | ||
Residential function | 0.377 | X9 | 0.290 |
X10 | 0.215 | ||
X11 | 0.244 | ||
X12 | 0.251 |
Level | PT | AT | RT | FT | IC | CT |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ⅰ | (0.0656, 0.1004] | (0.0188, 0.0704] | (0.0180, 0.1662] | (0.2999, 0.3869] | (0.2765, 0.7041] | (0.3240, 0.5179] |
Ⅱ | (0.1004, 0.1408] | (0.0704, 0.0921] | (0.1662, 0.1941] | (0.3869, 0.4165] | (0.7041, 0.7897] | (0.5179, 0.5902] |
Ⅲ | (0.1408, 0.1601] | (0.0921, 0.1180] | (0.1941, 0.2192] | (0.4165, 0.4690] | (0.7897, 0.8972] | (0.5902, 0.6170] |
Ⅳ | (0.1601, 0.2144] | (0.1180, 0.1867] | (0.2192, 0.3280] | (0.4690, 0.5740] | (0.8972, 0.9576] | (0.6170, 0.7388] |
Table 4 Classification of functional transformation index values using the quartile method
Level | PT | AT | RT | FT | IC | CT |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ⅰ | (0.0656, 0.1004] | (0.0188, 0.0704] | (0.0180, 0.1662] | (0.2999, 0.3869] | (0.2765, 0.7041] | (0.3240, 0.5179] |
Ⅱ | (0.1004, 0.1408] | (0.0704, 0.0921] | (0.1662, 0.1941] | (0.3869, 0.4165] | (0.7041, 0.7897] | (0.5179, 0.5902] |
Ⅲ | (0.1408, 0.1601] | (0.0921, 0.1180] | (0.1941, 0.2192] | (0.4165, 0.4690] | (0.7897, 0.8972] | (0.5902, 0.6170] |
Ⅳ | (0.1601, 0.2144] | (0.1180, 0.1867] | (0.2192, 0.3280] | (0.4690, 0.5740] | (0.8972, 0.9576] | (0.6170, 0.7388] |
1 | Cao Q, Sarker M N I, Sun J Y . 2019. Model of the influencing factors of the withdrawal from rural homesteads in China: Application of grounded theory method. Land Use Policy, 85: 285‒289. |
2 | Chen Y, Li W F, Ren L Y , et al. 2014. Changes in the distribution of rural residential land on a coastal plain. Resources Science, 36(11): 2273‒2281. (in Chinese) |
3 | Feng Y B, Yang Q Y . 2015. A review of research on the rural homestead evolution process and its regulation. Resources Science, 37(3): 442‒448. (in Chinese) |
4 |
Fu C . 2017. The evaluation of rural territorial functions: A case study of Henan, China. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 8(3): 242‒250.
DOI URL |
5 |
Gao X L, Jue J . 2013. Estimation of rural housing structure and its vulnerability in China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 23(1): 179‒191. (in Chinese)
DOI URL |
6 | Kong X S, Liu Y L, Jiang P , et al. 2018. A novel framework for rural homestead land transfer under collective ownership in China. Land Use Policy, 78: 138‒146. |
7 | Jiang G H, He X, Qu Y B , et al. 2016. Functional evolution of rural housing land: A comparative analysis across four typical areas representing different stages of industrialization in China. Land Use Policy, 57: 645‒654. |
8 | Li T T, Long H L . 2014. Rural development from viewpoints of transformation and coordination: A case in Shandong Province. Progress in Geography, 33(4): 531‒541. |
(in Chinese) Li Y R, Qiao L Y, Wang Q Y , et al. 2020. Towards the evaluation of rural livability in China: Theoretical framework and empirical case study. Habitat International, 105: 102241. DOI: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2020.102241. | |
9 | Liu X Q, Bi R T, Gao Y . 2011. The analysis of spatial distribution and optimization on rural settlement in upland half a mountainous using GIS technology. Economic Geography, 31(5): 822‒826. (in Chinese) |
10 | Long H L, Li T T . 2012. The coupling characteristics and mechanism of farmland and rural housing land transition in China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 22(3): 548‒562. (in Chinese) |
11 | Lu M Q, Wei L Y, Ge D Z , et al. 2020. Spatial optimization of rural settlements based on the perspective of appropriateness-domination: A case of Xinyi City. Habitat International, 98:102148. DOI: 10.1016/j.habita tint.2020.102148. |
12 | Ma W Q, Jiang G H, Li W Q , et al. 2019. Multifunctionality assessment of the land use system in rural residential areas: Confronting land use supply with rural sustainability demand. Journal of Environmental Management, 23(1): 1‒73. |
13 | Peerzado M B, Magsi H, Sheikh M J . 2019. Land use conflicts and urban sprawl: Conversion of agriculture lands into urbanization in Hyderabad, Pakistan. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences, 18: 423‒428. |
14 | Qi Q, Xu X F, Yang C M , et al. 2020. Study on the mechanisms and modes of functional transformation of rural residential land under the background of rural revitalization: Case analysis of typical villages. China Land Science, 34(6): 84‒9. (in Chinese) |
15 | Qu L T . 2014. Ecological function analysis of agricultural land in Hunan Province based on mean square error and TOPSIS model. Scientific and Technological Management of Land and Resources, 31(5): 14‒20. |
16 | Sikorski D, Latocha A, Szmytkie R , et al. 2020. Functional changes in peripheral mountainous areas in east central Europe between 2004 and 2016 as an aspect of rural revival? Kłodzko County case study. Applied Geography, 122:102223. DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2020.102223. |
17 | Song X Q . 2017. Discussion on land use transition research framework. Acta Geographica Sinica, 72(3): 471‒487. (in Chinese) |
18 | Song Y H, Wang J L, Hao S M , et al. 2014. The Energy-related impacts of social factors of rural houses in southwest China. Energy Procedia, 57: 1555‒1564. |
19 | Su K C, Hu B Q, Shi K , et al. 2019. The structural and functional evolution of rural homesteads in mountainous areas: A case study of Sujiaying Village in Yunnan Province, China. Land Use Policy, 88:104100. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104100. |
20 | Sun W B, Luo Y Q, Zhou W J , et al. 2012. Parametric study on bearing capacity of CFST members considering the concrete horizontal casting effect. Steel and Composite Structures, 13(3): 259‒275. |
21 | Tian G, Liu J, Zhuang D . 2003. The temporal-spatial characteristics of rural residential land in china in the 1990s. Acta Geographica Sinica, 58(5): 651‒658. (in Chinese) |
22 | Wang W D, Guo J, Fang L G , et al. 2012. A subjective and objective integrated weighting method for landslides susceptibility mapping based on GIS. Environmental Earth Sciences, 65(6): 1705‒1714. |
23 | Wu Y Z, Mo Z B, Peng Y , et al. 2018. Market-driven land nationalization in China: A new system for the capitalization of rural homesteads. Land Use Policy, 70: 559‒569. |
24 | Xu H Z, Liu Y X . 2016. Policy implications and impact of household registration system on peasants’ willingness to return rural residential lands: Evidence from household survey in rural China. Panoeconomicus, 63(1):135-146. |
25 | Zhang B L, Zhang F R, Zhou J , et al. 2015. Functional evolution of rural settlement based on micro-perspective: A case study of Hetaoyuan Village in Yishui County, Shandong Province. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 35(10): 1272‒1279. (in Chinese) |
26 | Zhang K H, Song S F . 2003. Rural-urban migration and urbanization in China: Evidence from time-series and cross-section analyses. China Economic Review, 14: 386‒400. |
27 | Zhao Q L, Jiang G H, Ma W Q , et al. 2019. Social security or profitability? Understanding multifunction of rural housing land from farmers’ needs: Spatial differentiation and formation mechanism—Based on a survey of 613 typical farmers in Pinggu District. Land Use Policy, 86:91-103. |
No related articles found! |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||