Progress in the Research on Benefit-sharing and Ecological Compensation Mechanisms for Transboundary Rivers

doi:10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2017.02.003

Abstract

Abstract: Transboundary rivers have important geopolitical and geo-economic connotations, but riparian states of transboundary rivers are often driven by their own rapid population growth and economic development to be-come involved in regional conflicts about the development and use of water resources. Therefore, finding a balance between the need for fair and reasonable development of water resources and the effective protection of environment from an ecological perspective has become a major problem faced by the international community. This paper begins with consideration of international water laws related to transboundary rivers and then reviews advances in the research on benefit-sharing, ecological compensation mechanisms, and adaptive management systems. We believe that existing international water laws form a complete legal system and that more attention needs to be paid to transboundary cooperation and sustainable water resource use. With respect to how transboundary water conflicts are resolved, there is a trend to move away from single water resource allocation (a zero-sum game) to benefit-sharing in order to achieve a win-win situation for riparian states, but there are still some difficulties in transboundary ecological compensation. In China, the central government has paid attention to horizontal ecological compensation between upstream and downstream, offering guidance to promote establishment of inter-province ecological compensation. Based on existing practice, horizontal ecological compensations are still in their infancy, small in scale, supported by a weak legal system, lacking market mechanisms to encourage their use and relying on fiscal transfers as the method of payment. In the future, China will need to intensify its research on legal system development, international cooperation, and benefit-sharing as these impact transboundary water resources. Because government can be seen as a management department with multiple identities (enabler, regulator and buyer), to improve adaptive transboundary ecological compensation mechanisms, government must develop as soon as possible data sharing platforms, standards of water consumption behaviors and intergovernmental policies (or ordinances).

Key words: benefit sharing, water resources, ecological compensation, transboundary rivers

HAN Ze, SONG Wei, DENG Xiangzheng. Progress in the Research on Benefit-sharing and Ecological Compensation Mechanisms for Transboundary Rivers[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2017, 8(2): 129-140.

References

[1] Allen C R, Fontaine J J, Pope K L, et al. 2010. Adaptive Management for a Turbulent Future. Journal of Environmental Management, 92(5): 1339– 1345.
[2] Arjoon D, Mohamed Y, Goor Q, et al. 2014. Hydro-Economic Risk Assessment in the Eastern Nile River Basin. Water Resources and Economics, 8: 16–31.
[3] Arjoon D, Tilmant A, Herrmann M. 2016. Sharing Water and Benefits in Transboundary River Basins. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 20(6): 2135–2150.
[4] Bai M H. 2013. The Evolution of International Water Laws and International Cooperation Theory. Foreign Affairs Review, 30(5): 102–112. (in Chinese)
[5] Zhang Q, Bennett M T, Kannan K, et al. 2010. Payments for Ecological Services and Eco-Compensation: Practices and Innovations in the People’s Republic of China. In: Proceedings from the International Conference on Payments for Ecological Services. Mandaluyong City, Philippines: Asian Development Bank.
[6] Bhaduri A, Liebe J. 2013. Cooperation in Transboundary Water Sharing with Issue Linkage: Game-Theoretical Case Study in the Volta Basin. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 139(3): 235– 245.
[7] Chen H P, Rieu-Clarke A, Wouters P. 2013. Exploring China's Transboundary Water Treaty Practice through the Prism of the Un Watercourses Convention. Water International, 38(2): 217–230.
[8] Cheng B, Tian R, Dong Z. 2012. Patterns and Assessment of the Watershed Eco-Compensation Standard Practices in China. Ecological Economy.(4): 24–29. (in Chinese)
[9] Cooley H, Christian-Smith J, Gleick P H, et al. 2009. Understanding and Reducing the Risks of Climate Change for Transboundary Waters. Oakland: Pacific Institute.
[10] Deng X Z, Li Z H, Gibson J. 2016. A Review on Trade-Off Analysis of Ecosystem Services for Sustainable Land-Use Management. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 26(7): 953–968.
[11] Deng X Z, Zhao C H. 2015. Identification of Water Scarcity and Providing Solutions for Adapting to Climate Changes in the Heihe River Basin of China. Advances in Meteorology, 2015(7): 1–13.
[12] Du X, Lu C. 2012. Evaluation and Trend Analysis of Surface Water Quality in Zhengzhou in 1998–2008. Chinese Journal of Population, Resources and Environment, 10(4): 44–51.
[13] Fabricius C, Cundill G. 2014. Learning in Adaptive Management: Insights from Published Practice. Ecology & Society, 19(19): 360–375.
[14] Fan Q X. 2010. Research on the Benefit Sharing Model of Hydropower Project Development[D]. Beijing, Tsinghua University. (in Chinese)
[15] Fang C, Liu H M, Li G. 2016. International Progress and Evaluation on Interactive Coupling Effects between Urbanization and the Eco- Environment. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 26(8): 1081–1116.
[16] Feng Y, He D M, Gan S, et al. 2006. Linkages of Transboundary Water Allocation and Its Eco-Thresholds with International Laws. Chinese Science Bulletin, 51(22): 25–32.
[17] Freeman R E. 2010. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Cambridge University Press, New York.
[18] Folke C, Berkes F, Colding J. 1998. Ecological Practises and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience and Sustainability. In: Berkes F, Folke C (eds.). Linking social and ecological systems: management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 414–436.
[19] Gao X L. 2009. Trends of Development of Modern International Water Law and Its Suggestions to China. Academic Exchange, 4: 56-58. (in Chinese)
[20] Gao T, Yang S. 2006. The Significance of International Ecological Compensation Policy to China. Environmental Protection, 19: 71–76. (in Chinese)
[21] Ge H F. 2013. Study on the Adaptive Management of the Downstream Reservoir Based on the Eco-Hydrology Responding Mechanism[D]. Beijing, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research. (in Chinese)
[22] He D, Wu R, Feng Y, et al. 2014. China’s Transboundary Waters: New Paradigms for Water and Ecological Security through Applied Ecology. Journal of Applied Ecology, 51(5): 1159–1168.
[23] Hua J, Li Z, Huang D. 2016. An International River Water Resource Development Cooperation System Based on Dissipative Structure Theory. Resources Science, 38(2): 239–247.
[24] Huang X S, Zheng R. 2012. Compensation Principle of the Beneficiaries of the Tansboundary Rivers. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 21(11): 1402–1408. (in Chinese)
[25] Huffman J L. 2009. Comprehensive River Basin Management: The Limits of Collaborative, Stakeholder-Based, Water Governance. Natural Resources Journal, 49(1): 117–149.
[26] ILA (International Law Association). 1966. Report of the Fifty-Second Conference, Helsinki, pp. 447 –533 (London: ILA).
[27] J?gerskog A, Granit J, Risberg J, et al. 2007. Transboundary Water Management as a Regional Public Good. Financing Development: An Example from the Nile Basin. Report Number 20. Stockholm: Stockholm International Water Institute (SIWI).
[28] Jeuland M, Baker J, Bartlett R, et al. 2014. The Costs of Uncoordinated Infrastructure Management in Multi-Reservoir River Basins. Environmental Research Letters, 9(10):105006.
[29] Jia R X, Gao G L. 2015. Study on the Establishment of Horizontal Ecological Compensation System between Regions. Macroeconomics, 3: 13–23. (in Chinese)
[30] Jiang Y Q, Ke C. 2016. A Review of Researches on Payment for Watershed Ecosystem Services. Ecological Economy, 32(04): 175–180. (in Chinese)
[31] Jo S Y, Jae-Won O, Jeong J H, et al. 1997. Transboundary Water Management as an International Public Good. Environmental Engineering Research, 2(3): 26–26.
[32] Klaphake A. 2005. Economic and Political Benefits of Transboundary Water Cooperation. In: Value of Water – Different Approaches in Transboundary Water Management. Koblenz: Proceedings of the International Workshop, 91–99.
[33] Kliot N, Shmueli D, Shamir U. 2001. Institutions for Management of Transboundary Water Resources: Their Nature, Characteristics and Shortcomings. Water Policy, 3(3): 229–255.
[34] Kong X. 2014. China Must Protect High-Quality Arable Land. Nature, 506(7486): 7.
[35] Lee S. 2015. Benefit Sharing in the Mekong River Basin. Water International, 40(1): 139–152.
[36] Li W F. How to Deal with the Entry into Force of "Convention on the Law of the Non Navigational Uses of International Watercourses" 2014 [cited 2016 October 8]. Available from: http://epaper.legaldaily.com. cn/fzrb/content/20140826/Articel10002GN.htm. (in Chinese)
[37] Liu M, Tian H, Lu C, et al. 2012. Effects of Multiple Environment Stresses on Evapotranspiration and Runoff over Eastern China. Journal of Hydrology, 426–427: 39–54.
[38] Ma G Y, Chen H. 2014. Study of an Ecological Compensation Mechanism Based on Stakeholders. Ecological Economy, 30(4): 33–36. (in Chinese)
[39] McCaffrey, S. 1998. The UN Convention on the Law of the Non- Navigational Uses of International Watercourses: prospects and pitfalls, in: S. Salman & L. Boisson de Chazournes (Eds) International Watercourses—Enhancing Cooperation and Managing Conflict, pp. 17–28, World Bank Technical Paper No. 414.
[40] McIntyre O. 2015. Benefit-Sharing and Upstream/Downstream Cooperation for Ecological Protection of Transboundary Waters: Opportunities for China as an Upstream State. Water International, 40(1): 48–70.
[41] Meissner R. 2005. Interest Groups as Local Stakeholders Involved in the Water Politics of a Transboundary River: The Case of the Proposed Epupa Dam in the Kunene River. In Wirkus L (eds.). Water, Development and Conflict – A Comparative Perspective: Euphrates-Tigris and Southern Africa. Bonn: Bonn International Center for Conversion, 101–121.
[42] ODI (Overseas Development Institute), Arcadis Euroconsult. 2000. Transboundary Water Management as an International Public Good: Prepared for Ministry for Foreign Affairs, Sweden. Ministry for Foreign Affairs, Sockholm, Sweden.
[43] Palesa S, Mokorosi. 2007. Can Benefits Be Shared Equitably among a Variety of Stakeholders in a Transboundary River Basin? Learning from Zambezi and Orange-Senqu River Basins. In: Proceedings of 8th WaterNet/WARFSA/GWP-SA Symposium, Pretoria: Global water partnership.
[44] Phughes T, Hgunderson L, Folke C, et al. 2007. Adaptive Management of the Great Barrier Reef and the Grand Canyon World Heritage Areas. Ambio A Journal of the Human Environment, 36(7): 586–592.
[45] Qaddumi H. 2008. Practical Approaches to Transboundary Water Benefit Sharing. Overseas Development Institute.
[46] Sadoff C W, Grey D. 2002. Beyond the River: The Benefits of Cooperation on International Rivers. Water Science & Technology A Journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research, 47(6): 91–96.
[47] Sadoff C W, Grey D. 2005. Cooperation on International Rivers: A Cont?inuum for Securing and Sharing Benefits. Water International, 30(4): 420–427.
[48] Salafsky N, Margoluis R, Redford K H, et al. 2002. Improving the Practice of Conservation: A Conceptual Framework and Research Agenda for Conservation Science. Conservation Biology, 16(6): 1469–1479.
[49] Salman S A A. 2007. The Helsinki Rules, the UN Watercourses Convention and the Berlin Rules: Perspectives on International Water Law. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 23(4): 625–640.
[50] Scherr S J, Bennett M T. 2011. Buyer, Regulator, and Enabler: The Government's Role in Ecosystem Services Markets: International lessons learned for payments for ecological services in the People’s Republic of China. Mandaluyong City, Philippines: Asian Development Bank.
[51] Shen M. 2005. Water Rights Trading and Government Innovation: A Case Study of Water Rights Trading in Dongyang and Yiwu Management World(6): 45–56. (in Chinese)
[52] Sims K R, Alixgarcia J M, Shapirogarza E, et al. 2014. Improving Environmental and Social Targeting through Adaptive Management in Mex?ico’s Payments for Hydrological Services Program. Conservation Biology, 28(5): 1151–1159.
[53] Skinner J, Niasse M, Haas L. 2009. Sharing the Benefits of Large Dams in West Africa. Iied Natural Resource Issues.
[54] Sneddon C, Fox C. 2006. Rethinking Transboundary Waters: A Critical Hydropolitics of the Mekong Basin. Political Geography, 25(2): 181– 202.
[55] Song W, Deng X Z. 2015. Effects of Urbanization-Induced Cultivated Land Loss on Ecosystem Services in the North China Plain. Energies, 8(6): 5678–5693.
[56] Song W, Deng X Z, Yuan Y W, et al. 2015a. Impacts of Land-Use Change on Valued Ecosystem Service in Rapidly Urbanized North China Plain. Ecological Modelling, 318: 245–253.
[57] Song W, Pijanowski B C, Tayyebi A. 2015b. Urban Expansion and Its Consumption of High-Quality Farmland in Beijing, China. Ecological Indicators, 54: 60–70.
[58] Stankey G H, Clark R N, Bormann B T. 2005. Adaptive Management of Natural Resources: Theory, Concepts, and Management Institutions. USDA Forest Service-General Technical Report PNW, 3(654): 286– 290.
[59] Suhardiman D, Wichelns D, Lebel L, et al. 2014. Benefit Sharing in Mekong Region Hydropower: Whose Benefits Count? Water Resources & Rural Development, 4: 3–11.
[60] Sun G J, He J. 2011. Research on Eco-Compensation in China. Commercial Times, 28(12): 100–102. (in Chinese)
[61] Tan M, Li X, Lu C, et al. 2008. Urban Population Densities and Their Policy Implications in China. Habitat International, 32(4): 471–484.
[62] Teasley R L, McKinney D C. 2011. Calculating the Benefits of Transboundary River Basin Cooperation: Syr Darya Basin. J Water Res Pl-Asce, 137(6): 481–490.
[63] Tilmant A, Kinzelbach W. 2012. The Cost of Noncooperation in Internat?ional River Basins. Water Resources Research, 48(1): 283–283.
[64] Van Hecken G, Bastiaensen J, Vásquez W F. 2012. The Viability of Local Payments for Watershed Services: Empirical Evidence from Matigu s, Nicaragua. Ecological Economics, 74: 169–176.
[65] Wang A M, Ge Y X, Y. G X. 2015. Analysis of Behavior Selection Mechanism of Ecological Compensation Stakeholders in Water Source Protec?tion Areas. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 36(5): 16–22. (in Chinese)
[66] Wang J, Hou C. 2013. Study on Implementation Framework and Compen-sation Pattern of Basin Ecological Compensation Mechanism in China: From the Perspective of Compensation Funds Source. China Popula?tion, Resources And Environment, 23(2): 23–29. (in Chinese)
[67] Wang J, Lin X H, Zhou Y. 2007a. Consideration on the Theory of Circular Economy to Guide the Ecological Compensation of the River Basin. Environmental Protection, 380(18): 47–49. (in Chinese)
[68] Wang L, Li Q, Bi H, et al. 2016. Human Impacts and Changes in the Coastal Waters of South China. Science of the Total Environment, 562: 108–114.
[69] Wang W J, Pan Y Z, Wang M C, et al. 2007b. Research on the Concept, Theory Framework and Application of Regional Ecosystem Adaptive Management. Environmental Monitoring In China, 23(02): 1–8. (in Chinese)
[70] Westgate M J, Likens G E, Lindenmayer D B. 2013. Adaptive Management of Biological Systems: A Review. Biological Conservation, 158: 128–139.
[71] Williams B K. 2011. Passive and Active Adaptive Management: Approaches and an Example. Journal of Environmental Management, 92(5): 1371–1378.
[72] Wouters P. 2014. The Yin and Yang of International Water Law: China’s Transboundary Water Practice and the Changing Contours of State Sovereignty. Review of European Comparative & International Environmental Law, 23(1): 67–75.
[73] Wouters P, Chen H. 2013. China's ‘Soft-Path’ to Transboundary Water Cooperation Examined in the Light of Two Un Global Water Conventions – Exploring the ‘Chinese Way’. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 22(6): 119–128.
[74] Wu J, Zhang J, Wang S, et al. 2016. Assessment of Food Security in China: A New Perspective Based on Production-Consumption Coordination. Sustainability, 8(3): 183.
[75] WWAP (United Nations World Water Assessment Programme), 2015. The Un World Water Development Report 2015, Water for a Sustainable World. UNESCO, Paris.
[76] Xie G, Cao S, Lu C, et al. 2012. Current Status and Future Trends for Eco-Compensation in China. Journal of Resources & Ecology, 6(6): 355–362.
[77] Yang L W, Zhen L, WU S T. 2010. An Analysis of Identific?aiton of Provider and Receiver for Eco-Compensation and Methods of Compensation Standard Calculation in China. Ecological Economy. (01): 298–302. (in Chinese)
[78] Yang S, Shen X C. 2009. The International Law as the Foundation in Solv?ing the Water Resources Distribution of International Rivers. Journal of Lanzhou University (Social Sciences), 37(4): 8–15. (in Chinese)
[79] Yang Q, Tian H, Friedrichs M A M, et al. 2014. Hydrological Responses to Climate and Land‐Use Changes Along the North American East Coast: A 110‐Year Historical Reconstruction. Jawra Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 51(1): 47–67.
[80] Yuan W Y, Zhou X K. 2014. Review of Research Progress Abroad in Pay?m?ents for Ecosystem Services. China Population, Resources and Environment, 24(11): 76–82. (in Chinese)
[81] Yu X, Feng S. 2011. Analysis of Ecological Compensation Standard Esti?mation of River Basins in China. China Population, Resources and En?vironment, 21(9): 14–19. (in Chinese)
[82] Zhao X Y, Xu W, Dong X, et al. 2009. The Research Advances and Pers?p?ectives of Spatial Selection of Ecological Compensation Objects. Jour?nal of Natural Resources, 24(10): 1772–1784. (in Chinese)
[83] Zhang Q, Michael B. 2011. Eco-compensation for watershed services in the People’s Republic of China. Mandaluyong City, Philippines, Asian Development Bank.
[84] Zhang Q, Bennett M, Kannan K, et al. 2010. Payments for ecological servi??ces and eco-compensation: Practices and innovations in the People’s Republic of China. Mandaluyong City, Phil?ippines, Asian Development Bank.
[85] Zhang Z, Cheng L, Shang H, et al. 2012. Review and Trend of Eco-Com?pensation Mechanism on River Basin. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 32(20): 6543–6552. (in Chinese)