1 Ajayi Richard A., Serletis, A. 2009. Testing for Causality in the Transmission of Eurodollar and US In terest Rates, Applied Financial Economics . 19(19): 439-443.
2 Aktas, C and Yilmaz, V. 2008. Causal relationship between oil consumption and economic growth in Turkey. KocaeliUniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 4(8): 45-55.
3 Asimakopoulos I., Ayling D, Mahmood W. M.. 2000. Non-Linear Granger Causality in the Currency Fu tures Returns. Economics Letters , 68(1): 25-30.
4 Aslanidis N. and Iranzo. S. 2009. Environment and Development: Is There A Kuznets Curve for CO 2 emissions. Applied Economics , 41(6): 803- 810.
5 Babatunde M. A. 2011. A bound testing analysis of Wagner’s law in Nigeria: 1970-2006, Applied Economics , 43(21): 2843-2850.
6 Bekiros S tel ios D, Diks, Cees G. H. 2008a. The Relationship between Crude Oil Spot and Futures Prices: Coin tegration, Linear and Nonlinear Causality. Energy Economics , 30(5): 2673-2685.
7 Bagh l, i M. 2006. A Model-Free Characterization of Causality. Economics Letters , 91(3): 380-388.
8 Boubaker, A. and Seba, i S. 2009. Inter-Market Information Flow: A Nonlinear Approach. Applied Economics Letters , 16(10): 1009-1015.
9 Chen, Shyh-Wei, Shen, Chung-Hua. 2009. Can the Nonlinear Present Value Model Explain the Movement of Stock Prices, International Research Journal of Finance and Economics . 23(23): 155-170.
10 Chiou-Wei, S., Chen, C., and Zhu, Z. 2008. Economic growth and energy consumption revisited—Evidence from linear and nonlinear Granger causality. Energ. Econ . 30(6): 3063-3076.
11 Christie, T. 2014. The effect of government spending on economic growth: testing the non-linear hypothesis, Bulletin of Economic Research , 66(2): 183-204.
12 Ciarreta, A., and Zarraga, A. 2007. Electricity consumption and economic growth: Evidence from Spain. Biltoki 1(1): 1-16.
13 Cole, M. A. 2004. US Environmental Load Displacement: Examining Consumption, Regulations and the Role of NAFTA, Ecological Economics . 48(4): 439-450.
14 Diks, C., and Panchenko, V. A. 2006. New statistic and practical guidelines for nonparametric Granger causality testing. J. Econ. Dyn. Control 30(9-10): 1647-1669.
15 D inda, S. 2004. Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis: A Survey. Ecological Economics . 49(4): 431-455.
16 D inda, S., Coondoo, D. 2006. Income and Emission: A Panel-Data Based Cointegration Analysis, Ecological Economics . 57(2): 167-181.
17 G. Bordogna, M. FedrLiu, S., Chang, T., Lee, C. -H. et al . 2012. Nonlinear adjustment to purchasing power parity: the ADL test for threshold cointegration, Applied Economics Letters , 19(6):1-5.
18 Galeott, i M., Lanza, A., Paul, i F. 2006. Reassessing the Environmental Kuznets Curve for CO2 Emission: A Robustness Exercise, Ecological Economics. 57(1): 152-163.
19 Gazi Salah Uddin, Muhammad Shahbaz, Mohamed Arouri, Frédéric Teulon. 2014. Financial development and poverty reduction nexus: A cointegration and causality analysis in Bangladesh. Economic Modelling , 36(1):405-412.
20 Gooijera, J. G. De, Sivarajasingham, S. 2008. Parametric and Nonparametric G ranger Causality Testing: Linkages Between International Stock Markets, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications . 387(11): 2547-2560.
21 Heil M. T., Selden, T. M. 2001. Carbon Emissions and Economic Development: Future Trajectories based on Historical Experience, Environment and Development Economics . 6: 63-83.
22 Hiemstra C., and Jones J. D. 1994. Testing for linear and nonlinear Granger causality in the stock price-volume relation. J. Financ. 49(5): 1639- 1664.
23 Hiroshi Ono. 2014. The government expenditure-economic growth relation in Japan: an analysis by using the ADL test for threshold cointegration. Applied Economics . 46( 28): 3523-3531
24 H oltz-Eak in, D., Seld en, T. M. 1995. Stoking the Fires? CO2 Emissions and Economic Growth, Journal of Public E conom ics. Vol. 57: 5-101.
25 jay, iRichard A., Serletis. 2009. A Testing for causality in the Transmission of Eurodollar and US Interest Rates. Applied Financial Economics, 19, 439-443.
26 Kumar, S., Webber, D. J. and Fargher, S. 2012. Wagner’s Law revisited: cointegration and causality tests for New Zealand, Applied Economics , 44(5): 607-623.
27 Lee, C. C., and Chang, C. P. 2005. Structural breaks, energy consumption, and economic growth revisited: Evidence from Taiwan. Energ. Econ . 27(6): 857-872.
28 Li, J. and Lee, J. 2010. ADL test for threshold cointegration, Journal of Time Series Analysis , 31, 241-54.
29 Lindmark, M. 2002. An EKC-pattern in Historical Perspective: Carbon Dioxide Emissions, Technology, Fuel Prices and Growth in Sweden, 1870-1997, Ecological Economics , 42(1): 333 -347.
30 Lise, W., and Montfort, K. V. 2007. Energy consumption and GDP in Turkey: Is there a co-integration relationship? Energ. Econ . 29: 1166-1178.
31 Mohammed Alzahrani, Mansur Masih, Omar Al-Titi. 2014. Linear and non-linear Granger causality between oil spot and futures prices: A wavelet based test.. Journal of International Money and Finance , 48, 175-201.
32 Odhiambo, N. M. 2009. Energy consumption and economic growth nexus in Tanzania: An ARDL bounds testing approach. Energ. Policy, 37: 617-622.
33 Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y. and Smith, R. J. (2001) Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships, Journal of Applied Econometrics , 16, 289-326.
34 S. Nazlioglu, S. Kayhan, U. Adiguzel. 2014. Electricity Consumption and Economic Growth in Turkey: Cointegration, Linear and Nonlinear Granger Causality. Energy Sources. Part B . 9(4): 315-324.
35 Soytas, U., Sar, iR. 2009. Energy Consumption, Economic Growth, and Carbon Emssions: Challenges Faced by an EU Candidate Member, Ecological Economics . 68(6): 1667-1675.
36 W. and Siklos, P.. 2001. Cointegration and threshold adjustment, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics , 19:166-76.
37 Yoo, S. 2006. Oil consumption and economic growth: Evidence from Korea. Energ. Source. Part B, 1: 235-243.
38 ZHANG Leqin, CHEN Suping, ZHU Yawen, et al . The Measurement of Carbon Emission Effect of Construction Land Changes in Anhui Province Based on the Extended LMDI Model. Journal of Resources and Ecology . 4(2):186-192. |