Journal of Resources and Ecology ›› 2019, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (6): 621-631.DOI: 10.5814/j.issn.1674-764X.2019.06.007
• Ecosystem Services • Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHANG Changshun1,2,*(), ZHEN Lin1,2, LIU Chunlan3, LIANG Yihang1,4
Received:
2019-07-01
Accepted:
2019-08-09
Online:
2019-11-30
Published:
2019-12-09
Contact:
ZHANG Changshun
Supported by:
ZHANG Changshun, ZHEN Lin, LIU Chunlan, LIANG Yihang. Research on the Patterns and Evolution of Ecosystem Service Consumption in the “Belt and Road”[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2019, 10(6): 621-631.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.jorae.cn/EN/10.5814/j.issn.1674-764X.2019.06.007
Crop type | Harvest index | Moisture content | Crop type | Harvest index | Moisture content |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rice | 0.50 | 0.13 | Rapeseed | 0.26 | 0.09 |
Maize | 0.49 | 0.13 | Sesame | 0.34 | 0.09 |
Wheat | 0.46 | 0.13 | Sunflower | 0.32 | 0.09 |
Grain | 0.31 | 0.13 | Other oilseeds | 0.36 | 0.09 |
Other Cereals | 0.38 | 0.13 | Sugar beets | 0.71 | 0.133 |
Sorghum | 0.31 | 0.13 | Sugarcane | 0.7 | 0.133 |
Barley | 0.49 | 0.13 | Fiber Crops | 0.38 | 0.133 |
Beans | 0.42 | 0.13 | Tobacco | 0.61 | 0.082 |
Potato | 0.59 | 0.133 | Vegetables | 0.49 | 0.82 |
Other roots | 0.67 | 0.133 | Fruits | 0.49 | 0.82 |
Cotton | 0.16 | 0.083 | Tea | 0.71 | 0.08 |
Peanut | 0.50 | 0.09 | - | - | - |
Crop type | Harvest index | Moisture content | Crop type | Harvest index | Moisture content |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rice | 0.50 | 0.13 | Rapeseed | 0.26 | 0.09 |
Maize | 0.49 | 0.13 | Sesame | 0.34 | 0.09 |
Wheat | 0.46 | 0.13 | Sunflower | 0.32 | 0.09 |
Grain | 0.31 | 0.13 | Other oilseeds | 0.36 | 0.09 |
Other Cereals | 0.38 | 0.13 | Sugar beets | 0.71 | 0.133 |
Sorghum | 0.31 | 0.13 | Sugarcane | 0.7 | 0.133 |
Barley | 0.49 | 0.13 | Fiber Crops | 0.38 | 0.133 |
Beans | 0.42 | 0.13 | Tobacco | 0.61 | 0.082 |
Potato | 0.59 | 0.133 | Vegetables | 0.49 | 0.82 |
Other roots | 0.67 | 0.133 | Fruits | 0.49 | 0.82 |
Cotton | 0.16 | 0.083 | Tea | 0.71 | 0.08 |
Peanut | 0.50 | 0.09 | - | - | - |
Livestock | Conversion coefficient | Livestock | Conversion coefficient |
---|---|---|---|
Sheep | 1.0 | Mule | 5.0 |
Goat | 0.8 | Camel | 8.5 |
Cattle | 6.5 | Rabbit | 0.125 |
Buffalo | 7.0 | Pig | 1.5 |
Yak | 4.5 | Goose | 0.2 |
Horse | 5.5 | Chicken | 0.05 |
Ass | 3.0 | Pigeon | 0.02 |
Livestock | Conversion coefficient | Livestock | Conversion coefficient |
---|---|---|---|
Sheep | 1.0 | Mule | 5.0 |
Goat | 0.8 | Camel | 8.5 |
Cattle | 6.5 | Rabbit | 0.125 |
Buffalo | 7.0 | Pig | 1.5 |
Yak | 4.5 | Goose | 0.2 |
Horse | 5.5 | Chicken | 0.05 |
Ass | 3.0 | Pigeon | 0.02 |
Consumption patterns | Average ratios of grassland/farmland/ forestland (%) | 2000 | 2005 | 2010 | 2016 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of counries | Area (104 km2) | Number of countries | Area (104 km2) | Number of countries | Area (104 km2) | Number of countries | Area (104 km2) | ||
Higher farmland (I) | 20.54/63.34/16.11 | 37 | 3641.92 | 45 | 4068.22 | 44 | 3888.74 | 42 | 3919.80 |
Higher forestland (II) | 14.63/21.07/64.29 | 3 | 14.75 | 1 | 3.76 | 3 | 14.75 | 5 | 18.20 |
Higher grassland (III) | 93.68/3.85/2.47 | 1 | 156.58 | 1 | 156.58 | 1 | 156.58 | 1 | 156.58 |
Higher farmland + higher grassland (IV) | 48.72/44.30/6.98 | 20 | 1131.26 | 16 | 818.05 | 16 | 964.58 | 16 | 930.07 |
Higher farmland + higher forest + higher grassland (V) | 21.52/44.69/33.79 | 4 | 113.09 | 2 | 11.00 | 1 | 32.95 | 1 | 32.95 |
Consumption patterns | Average ratios of grassland/farmland/ forestland (%) | 2000 | 2005 | 2010 | 2016 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of counries | Area (104 km2) | Number of countries | Area (104 km2) | Number of countries | Area (104 km2) | Number of countries | Area (104 km2) | ||
Higher farmland (I) | 20.54/63.34/16.11 | 37 | 3641.92 | 45 | 4068.22 | 44 | 3888.74 | 42 | 3919.80 |
Higher forestland (II) | 14.63/21.07/64.29 | 3 | 14.75 | 1 | 3.76 | 3 | 14.75 | 5 | 18.20 |
Higher grassland (III) | 93.68/3.85/2.47 | 1 | 156.58 | 1 | 156.58 | 1 | 156.58 | 1 | 156.58 |
Higher farmland + higher grassland (IV) | 48.72/44.30/6.98 | 20 | 1131.26 | 16 | 818.05 | 16 | 964.58 | 16 | 930.07 |
Higher farmland + higher forest + higher grassland (V) | 21.52/44.69/33.79 | 4 | 113.09 | 2 | 11.00 | 1 | 32.95 | 1 | 32.95 |
1 |
Chen A, Li R, Wang H , et al. 2015. Quantitative assessment of human appropriation of aboveground net primary production in China. Ecological Modelling, 312(24):54-60.
DOI URL |
2 | Du W . 2018. Study on Ecological Carrying Capacity based on Ecological Supply and Consumption—Taking Hainan for Example. MSc diss., Chang' an University. (in Chinese). |
3 |
Fetzel T, Niedertscheider M, Haberl H , et al. 2016. Patterns and changes of land use and land-use efficiency in Africa 1980-2005: An analysis based on the human appropriation of net primary production framework. Regional Environmental Change, 16(5):1507-1520.
DOI URL |
4 |
WWF (World Wildlife Fund). 2004. Living Planet Report. Gland, Switzerland: Avenue du Mont-Blanc.
DOI URL PMID |
5 |
Guo H, Cai J, Yang Z . 2013. Modeling for measuring city food footprint with applied empirical analysis. Journal of Natural Resources, 28(3):417-425. (in Chinese)
DOI URL |
6 | Haberl H . 1997. Human appropriation of net primary production as an environmental indicator: implications for sustainable development. Ambio, 26(3):143-146. |
7 |
Helmut H, K Heinz E, K Fridolin , et al. 2007. Quantifying and mapping the human appropriation of net primary production in earth's terrestrial ecosystems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(31):12942-12947.
DOI URL PMID |
8 |
Imhoff M L, Bounoua L, Ricketts T , et al. 2004. Global patterns in human consumption of net primary production. Nature, 429(6994):870-873.
DOI URL PMID |
9 |
Kastner T . 2009. Trajectories in human domination of ecosystems: Human appropriation of net primary production in the Philippines during the 20th century. Ecological Economics, 69(2):260-269.
DOI URL |
10 |
Kastner T, Erb K, Haberl H . 2015. Global Human Appropriation of Net Primary Production for Biomass Consumption in the European Union, 1986- 2007. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 19(5):825-836.
DOI URL PMID |
11 |
Lindeman R L . 1942. The trophic-dynamic aspect of ecology. Ecology, 23(4):399-418.
DOI URL |
12 | Liu J Y. 2005. Integrated Ecosystem Assessment of Western China. Beijing: China Meteorological Press. |
13 | Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. Washington D C: Island Press. |
14 |
Norbaard R B . 2009. Ecosystem services: From eye-opening metaphor to complexity blinder. Ecological Economics, 69(6):1219-1227.
DOI URL |
15 | Pan L, Yan H, Huang H , et al. 2012. Multi-agent modeling method of reasonable consumption of ecosystem service:A case of the Farming Pastoral Zone in Inner Mongolia. Resources Science, 34(6):1007-1016. (in Chinese) |
16 | Plutzar C, Kroisleitner C, Haberl H , et al. 2015. Changes in the spatial patterns of human appropriation of net primary production (HANPP) in Europe 1990-2006. Regional Environmental Change, 41(7):1-14. |
17 |
Tian M, Shi Y, Huang Y , et al. 2016. An empirical analysis of effects of economic development and forest product trade on wood consumption in china. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 52(9):113-123. (in Chinese)
DOI URL |
18 |
Vitousek P M, Mooney H A, Lubchenco J , et al. 1997. Human domination of Earth’s ecosystems. Science, 277(5325):494-499.
DOI URL |
19 |
Wu S . 2017. Economic development of countries along the Belt and Road. Review of Economic Research, 15:16-45. (in Chinese)
DOI URL PMID |
20 | Xiao J . 2009. The dependence of traditional brewing industry and grain production in the republic of China (1912-1949). Social Science Journal, ( 2):139-145. (in Chinese) |
21 | Yan H, Zhen L, Li F , et al. 2012. Measurement method of reasonable consumption for ecosystem productivity supply service: A case study of Inner Mongolia grassland transect. Resources Science, 34(6):998-1006. (in Chinese) |
22 | Zhen L, Liu X, Wei Y . 2008. Consumption of ecosystem services: models,measurement and management framework. Resources Science, 30(1):100-106. (in Chinese) |
23 | Zhen L, H Yan, Y Hu , et al. 2012. Consumption of ecosystem goods and services and its impact assessment. Resources Science, 34(6):989-997. (in Chinese) |
[1] | XIE Hualin, CHEN Qianru. Land Use and Ecological Civilization: A Collection of Empirical Studies [J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2021, 12(2): 137-142. |
[2] | FENG Yanyun, ZHAO Yuluan, YANG Zhimou, XUE Chaolang, LIU Yan. Spatio-temporal Differentiation of Trade-offs and Synergies of Ecosystem Services in Typical Mountain Areas of China [J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2021, 12(2): 268-279. |
[3] | CAI Shizhen, ZHANG Xuliang, CAO Yinghui, ZHANG Zhaohui, WANG Wei. Values of the Farmland Ecosystem Services of Qingdao City, China, and their Changes [J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2020, 11(5): 443-453. |
[4] | GAO Min, XIAO Yan, HU Yunfeng. Evaluation of Water Yield and Soil Erosion in the Three-River-Source Region under Different Land-Climate Sce-narios [J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2020, 11(1): 13-26. |
[5] | ZHEN Lin, XU Zengrang, ZHAO Yuan, WANG Jijun, HU Yunfeng, WANG Juanle. Ecological Carrying Capacity and Green Development in the “Belt and Road” Initiative Region [J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2019, 10(6): 569-573. |
[6] | LIANG Yihang, ZHEN Lin, JIA Mengmeng, HU Yunfeng, ZHANG Changshun, LUO Qi. Consumption of Ecosystem Services in Laos [J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2019, 10(6): 641-648. |
[7] | BAO Yingshuang,CHENG Leilei,LU Qi. Assessment of Desert Ecological Assets and Countermeasures for Ecological Compensation [J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2019, 10(1): 56-62. |
[8] | LIN Yongsheng,GUO Zhixin,ZHENG Yaomin,ZHANG Lirong,HUANG Huabing. Net Horizontal Payments for Ecosystem Services: An Application in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region of China [J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2019, 10(1): 63-68. |
[9] | DU Wenpeng, YAN Huimin, YANG Yanzhao, LIU Fang. Evaluation Methods and Research Trends for Ecological Carrying Capacity [J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2018, 9(2): 115-124. |
[10] | WANG Mingkuan, MO Hongwei. The Impact of Spatial Heterogeneity on Ecosystem Service Value in a Case Study in Liuyang River Basin, China [J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2018, 9(2): 209-217. |
[11] | ZHAO Zhilong, WU Xue, ZHANG Yili, GAO Jungang. Assessment of Changes in the Value of Ecosystem Services in the Koshi River Basin, Central High Himalayas Based on Land Cover Changes and the CA-Markov Model [J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2017, 8(1): 67-76. |
[12] | Krittika Roy. Human Response to Degradation of Ecosystems [J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2016, 7(4): 261-268. |
[13] | SUN Xueping, WANG Bin, LIU Moucheng, LIU Weiwei. The Ecosystem Service Function of Shandong Xiajin Yellow River Ancient Mulberry Trees System and Its Effect on Regional Ecosystem [J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2016, 7(3): 223-230. |
[14] | XU Jie, XIAO Yu, LI Na, WANG Hao. Spatial and Temporal Patterns of Supply and Demand Balance of Water Supply Services in the Dongjiang Lake Basin and Its Beneficiary Areas [J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2015, 6(6): 386-396. |
[15] | ZHAO Minjuan, XV Tao, SHI Hengtong, YAO Liuyang, LIU Bingyang, LU Qian. Ecosystem Service Valuation of Watershed Restoration in the Shiyang River Basin under Heterogeneous Preferences [J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2015, 6(6): 405-411. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||