The Decoupling Relationship between the Expansion of Urban Construction Land and Economic Growth in Jilin Province

doi:10.5814/j.issn.1674-764X.2019.03.005

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to explore the relationship between urban construction land and economic development, this paper uses a decoupling model to analyze the decoupling relationship between expansion of urban construction land and economic growth in Jilin Province. The results show that from 2000 to 2015, the decoupling of urban construction land expansion and economic growth in Jilin province tended to be reasonable. The paper divides urban decoupling into three categories. The first type consists of ideal cities, including Liaoyuan and Baishan. The second type includes basic ideal cities like Changchun, Tonghua, Songyuan, Baicheng, and Yanbian. The third type consists of non-ideal cities, including Jilin and Siping. This paper puts forward relevant measures to promote the further decoupling of construction land expansion and economic growth in order to realize the sustainable use of land resources.

Key words: urban construction land, economic growth, decoupling theory, elasticity analysis method, Jilin Province

LIU Baotao. The Decoupling Relationship between the Expansion of Urban Construction Land and Economic Growth in Jilin Province[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2019, 10(3): 275-281.

Figures/Tables 3

References 23

[1]	Che X C, Li C L.2014. Spatial distribution characteristics of land intensive use and driving factors of resource based cities in Northeast China.Resource Development & Market, 30(11): 1320-1323. (in Chinese)
[2]	Hansen G D, Edward C. P.2002. Malthus to Solow.American Economic Review, 92(4): 1205-1217.
[3]	He W, Xiu C L.2011. Analysis of spatial difference in regional urban land intensive utilization: A case study of Jilin Province.Journal of Natural Resources, 26(8): 1287-1296. (in Chinese)
[4]	Huang J K, Zhu L F, Deng X Z.2007. Regional differences and determinants of built-up area expansion in China.Science China: Earth Sciences, 37(9): 1235-1241. (in Chinese)
[5]	Jiang H, Qu F T.2009. Contribution and response of constructed land expansion to economic growth in different development stages: A case study for Jiangsu.China Population, Resources and Environment, 19(1): 70-75. (in Chinese)
[6]	Jin H R, Ma P P, Qi W, et al.2017. Research on the influence of urban planning and land use planning policy on construction land expansion.Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 31(7): 22-27. (in Chinese)
[7]	Karen C. S, Robert K. K.2003. Modeling the drivers of urban land use change in the Pearl River Delta, China: Integrating remote sensing with socioeconomic data.Land Economics, 79(1): 106-121.
[8]	Li X S, Qu F T, Guo Z S, et al.2008. Decoupling between urban and rural construction land.China Population Resources and Environment, 18(5): 179-184. (in Chinese)
[9]	Li X, Ma X D.2015. The mechanism of construction land expansion caused by excessive growth of economic efficiency.Urban Issues, (8): 2-7. (in Chinese)
[10]	Li Y C, Pan H, Jin X W.2015. Study on the realization route of the transformation of economic growth mode under the new normal situation in Jilin Province.Journal of Northeast Normal University, (6): 98-103. (in Chinese)
[11]	Liu B T.2017. Research on coordination development of new urbanization and land health utilization in Jilin Province. Changchun:Jilin University.(in Chinese)
[12]	Lu W H, Liu J S, Na W.2012. Industry conversion simulation analysis of resource-exhausted mining city based on the system dynamics: Taking Liaoyuan City of Jilin Province as example.Scientia Geographica Sinica, 32(5): 577-583. (in Chinese)
[13]	Ngai L R.2004. Barriers and the transition to modern growth.Journal of Monetary Economics, 51(7): 1353-1383.
[14]	Sheng Y X.2015. Decoupling of economic growth and urban land expansion. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University.(in Chinese)
[15]	State Council of the People’s Republic of China.2016. Several opinions of Central Committee of the Communist Party of China on the revitalization of the old industrial bases in Northeast China. People’s Daily, 2016-04-27(1).
[16]	Streutker D R.2002. A remote sensing study of the urban heat island of Houston, Texas.International Journal of Remote Sensing, 23(13): 2595-2608.
[17]	Tapio P.2005. Towards a theory of decoupling: Degrees of decoupling in the EU and the case of road traffic in Finland between 1970 and 2001.Transport Policy, 12(2): 137-151.
[18]	Vehmas J, Kaivooja J, Luukkanen J.2003. Global Trends of Linking Environmental Stress and Economic Growth. Turku: Tutu Publications: 1-25.
[19]	Xu J, Lu C S, Zhang T T, et al.2016. Decoupling analysis of economic growth and construction land expansion in Anhui Province.Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 55(18): 4869-4872. (in Chinese)
[20]	Yin F, Li H Z.2008. Construction land, economic growth: An analysis based capital output ratio Chinese provincial panel data from 1999 to 2005.World Economic Papers, (2): 13-27. (in Chinese)
[21]	Zhang X R, Rao L L, Jiang Xiao.2016. Decoupling research of construction land sprawl between economic growth in the inland open area: A case study of Chongqing City.Journal of Chongqing Normal University, 33(4): 201-210. (in Chinese)
[22]	Zhong T Y, Huang X J, Han Li, et al.2010. Review on the research of decoupling analysis in the field of environments and resource.Journal of Natural Resource, 25(8): 1400-1412. (in Chinese)
[23]	Zhou Y, Zhang J F, Zhang A L, et al.2017. Regional differences of the contributions to economic growth from construction differentiated management strategies: A case study of Wuhan metropolitan land and area.Research of Agricultural Modernization, 38(1): 74-80. (in Chinese)

Status		Urban construction land change (ΔCCL)	GDP change (ΔGDP)	GDP elasticity coefficient of urban construction land (t)
Negative decoupling	Growth negative decoupling	>0	>0	t>1.2
	Strong negative decoupling	>0	<0	t<0
	Weak negative decoupling	<0	<0	0<t<0.8
Decoupling	Weak decoupling	>0	>0	0<t<0.8
	Strong decoupling	<0	>0	t<0
	Decay decoupling	<0	<0	t>1.2
Link	Growth link	>0	>0	0.8<t<1.2
Link	Decay link	<0	<0	0.8<t<1.2

Status		Urban construction land change (ΔCCL)	GDP change (ΔGDP)	GDP elasticity coefficient of urban construction land (t)
Negative decoupling	Growth negative decoupling	>0	>0	t>1.2
	Strong negative decoupling	>0	<0	t<0
	Weak negative decoupling	<0	<0	0<t<0.8
Decoupling	Weak decoupling	>0	>0	0<t<0.8
	Strong decoupling	<0	>0	t<0
	Decay decoupling	<0	<0	t>1.2
Link	Growth link	>0	>0	0.8<t<1.2
Link	Decay link	<0	<0	0.8<t<1.2

Year	Study area
Year	Changchun	Jilin	Siping	Liaoyuan	Tonghua	Baishan	Songyuan	Baicheng	Yanbian
2001	0.378 1	0.394 5	0.058 0	1.628 2	1.677 8	1.678 8	0.153 3	0.646 1	0.000 0
2002	0.153 1	0.349 3	0.090 5	-0.566 1	0.000 0	0.118 5	0.023 7	0.143 7	0.000 2
2003	0.096 3	0.908 8	-0.163 1	0.170 7	0.737 5	0.127 3	0.059 9	0.196 8	0.235 1
2004	0.657 2	0.170 1	0.076 0	0.258 3	0.401 4	0.000 0	0.078 8	0.093 3	0.567 7
2005	1.160 9	0.091 9	0.000 0	0.170 6	0.336 1	-0.465 2	0.336 9	0.334 8	0.007 7
2006	1.605 8	-1.292 5	0.000 0	0.000 0	-3.059 0	0.107 8	0.087 7	0.000 0	0.214 7
2007	0.532 5	0.000 0	0.000 0	0.211 5	2.404 9	0.350 4	0.030 2	0.000 0	0.026 3
2008	0.616 1	0.271 2	0.096 3	0.000 0	0.052 2	0.269 0	0.000 0	0.000 0	-0.019 9
2009	1.033 8	0.061 4	0.248 0	0.097 6	0.026 0	0.276 3	0.399 1	0.000 0	0.000 0
2010	0.286 8	0.000 0	1.303 1	0.323 6	0.608 7	0.129 4	0.258 2	0.000 0	0.566 4
2011	0.316 7	0.205 3	0.235 4	0.000 0	0.524 9	0.127 5	0.190 8	0.553 1	0.186 7
2012	0.065 3	-0.201 1	0.194 9	-0.001 1	0.057 8	-0.191 7	0.201 3	0.244 6	0.019 6
2013	0.387 1	0.486 7	0.062 3	-0.004 0	0.133 7	1.599 7	0.115 5	0.155 1	0.253 5
2014	0.400 6	-1.036 8	0.000 0	0.000 0	0.245 4	-3.953 3	2.658 5	0.628 5	0.132 0
2015	0.923 4	2.835 0	1.640 4	0.000 0	0.495 2	0.583 4	0.504 0	0.168 5	0.000 0

Year	Study area
Year	Changchun	Jilin	Siping	Liaoyuan	Tonghua	Baishan	Songyuan	Baicheng	Yanbian
2001	0.378 1	0.394 5	0.058 0	1.628 2	1.677 8	1.678 8	0.153 3	0.646 1	0.000 0
2002	0.153 1	0.349 3	0.090 5	-0.566 1	0.000 0	0.118 5	0.023 7	0.143 7	0.000 2
2003	0.096 3	0.908 8	-0.163 1	0.170 7	0.737 5	0.127 3	0.059 9	0.196 8	0.235 1
2004	0.657 2	0.170 1	0.076 0	0.258 3	0.401 4	0.000 0	0.078 8	0.093 3	0.567 7
2005	1.160 9	0.091 9	0.000 0	0.170 6	0.336 1	-0.465 2	0.336 9	0.334 8	0.007 7
2006	1.605 8	-1.292 5	0.000 0	0.000 0	-3.059 0	0.107 8	0.087 7	0.000 0	0.214 7
2007	0.532 5	0.000 0	0.000 0	0.211 5	2.404 9	0.350 4	0.030 2	0.000 0	0.026 3
2008	0.616 1	0.271 2	0.096 3	0.000 0	0.052 2	0.269 0	0.000 0	0.000 0	-0.019 9
2009	1.033 8	0.061 4	0.248 0	0.097 6	0.026 0	0.276 3	0.399 1	0.000 0	0.000 0
2010	0.286 8	0.000 0	1.303 1	0.323 6	0.608 7	0.129 4	0.258 2	0.000 0	0.566 4
2011	0.316 7	0.205 3	0.235 4	0.000 0	0.524 9	0.127 5	0.190 8	0.553 1	0.186 7
2012	0.065 3	-0.201 1	0.194 9	-0.001 1	0.057 8	-0.191 7	0.201 3	0.244 6	0.019 6
2013	0.387 1	0.486 7	0.062 3	-0.004 0	0.133 7	1.599 7	0.115 5	0.155 1	0.253 5
2014	0.400 6	-1.036 8	0.000 0	0.000 0	0.245 4	-3.953 3	2.658 5	0.628 5	0.132 0
2015	0.923 4	2.835 0	1.640 4	0.000 0	0.495 2	0.583 4	0.504 0	0.168 5	0.000 0

Study area	Year
Study area	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015
Chang- chun	Weak decoupling	Weak decoupling	Weak decoupling	Weak decoupling	Growth link	Growth negative decoupling	Weak decoupling	Weak decoupling	Growth link	Weak decoupling	Weak decoupling	Weak decoupling	Weak decoupling	Weak decoupling	Growth link
Jilin	Weak decoupling	Weak decoupling	Growth link	Weak decoupling	Weak decoupling	Strong negative decoupling	Critical state	Weak decoupling	Weak decoupling	Critical state	Weak decoupling	Strong decoupling	Weak decoupling	Strong negative decoupling	Growth negative decoupling
Siping	Weak decoupling	Weak decoupling	Strong decoupling	Weak decoupling	Critical state	Critical state	Critical state	Weak decoupling	Weak decoupling	Growth negative decoupling	Weak decoupling	Weak decoupling	Weak decoupling	Critical state	Growth negative decoupling
Liaoyuan	Growth negative decoupling	Strong negative decoupling	Weak decoupling	Weak decoupling	Weak decoupling	Critical state	Weak decoupling	Critical state	Weak decoupling	Weak decoupling	Critical state	Weak decoupling	Weak decoupling	Critical state	Critical state
Tonghua	Growth negative decoupling	Critical state	Weak decoupling	Weak decoupling	Weak decoupling	Strong decoupling	Growth negative decoupling	Weak decoupling	Weak decoupling	Weak decoupling	Weak decoupling	Weak decoupling	Weak decoupling	Weak decoupling	Weak decoupling
Bai- shan	Growth negative decoupling	Weak decoupling	Weak decoupling	Weak decoupling	Strong negative decoupling	Weak decoupling	Weak decoupling	Weak decoupling	Weak decoupling	Weak decoupling	Weak decoupling	Strong decoupling	Growth negative decoupling	Weak decoupling	Weak decoupling
Songyuan	Weak decoupling	Weak decoupling	Weak decoupling	Weak decoupling	Weak decoupling	Weak decoupling	Weak decoupling	Critical state	Weak decoupling	Weak decoupling	Weak decoupling	Weak decoupling	Weak decoupling	Growth negative decoupling	Weak decoupling
Baicheng	Weak decoupling	Weak decoupling	Weak decoupling	Weak decoupling	Weak decoupling	Critical state	Critical state	Critical state	Critical state	Critical state	Weak decoupling	Weak decoupling	Weak decoupling	Weak decoupling	Weak decoupling
Yanbian	Critical state	Weak decoupling	Weak decoupling	Weak decoupling	Weak decoupling	Weak decoupling	Weak decoupling	Strong decoupling	Critical state	Weak decoupling	Weak decoupling	Weak decoupling	Weak decoupling	Weak decoupling	Critical state