泾河流域农业旱灾风险定量评估及其空间特征

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-764x.2011.04.007

资源与生态学报 ›› 2011, Vol. 2 ›› Issue (4): 338-344.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-764x.2011.04.007

泾河流域农业旱灾风险定量评估及其空间特征

龙鑫^1,2, 甄霖¹, 成升魁¹, 邸苏闯³

1. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,北京 100101;
2. 中国科学院研究生院,北京 100049;
3. 北京市水利科学研究所, 北京 100048

收稿日期:2011-09-18 修回日期:2011-11-01 出版日期:2011-12-30 发布日期:2011-12-22
通讯作者: CHENG Shengkui. Email: chengsk@igsnrr.ac.cn.

Quantitative Assessment and Spatial Characteristics of Agricultural Drought Risk in the Jinghe Watershed, Northwestern China

LONG Xin^1,2, ZHEN Lin¹, CHENG Shengkui¹, DI Suchuang³

1. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China;
2. Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
3. Beijing Hydraulic Research Institute, Beijing 100048, China

Received:2011-09-18 Revised:2011-11-01 Online:2011-12-30 Published:2011-12-22
Supported by:
National Key Technology R&D Program (No. 2008BAK50B05), National Key Project for basic research (973) (No.2009CB421106) and the Knowledge Innovation Program of CAS (No. KZCX2-EW-306).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 泾河流域是农业旱灾的多发地区,但是对该地农业旱灾的发生规律、旱灾影响及旱灾恢复和准备措施方面开展的研究还较少。本文根据自然灾害风险评估的理论框架,建立了1km栅格精度的泾河流域农业旱灾风险空间评估模型,并对农业旱灾致灾因子危险性及农业承险体脆弱性进行评估,最后综合评估该地区农业旱灾风险。在此基础上,分析研究区农业旱灾危险性、承险体脆弱性及风险的空间特征。本研究采用Z指数方法评估泾河流域农业旱灾致灾因子的强度,选取农作物生长季缺水率、土壤有效含水量、有效灌溉面积比以及坡度等4个指标评估研究区1km空间尺度的农业旱灾脆弱性。农业旱灾风险综合评估的结果表明,泾河流域农业旱灾风险的高风险区位于该地区北部,低风险区位于该地区南部,且不同等级风险区呈现出自东向西、自南向北逐渐降低的总体趋势,但不同等级风险区呈现间隔分布的趋势。

关键词: 农业旱灾, 自然灾害, 脆弱性, 风险评估, 泾河流域

Abstract: Though drought is a recurrent phenomenon in the Jinghe watershed, very little attention has been paid to drought mitigation and preparedness. This article presents a method for the spatial assessment of agricultural drought risk in the Jinghe watershed of western China at a 1-km grid scale. A conceptual framework, which emphasizes the combined roles of hazard and vulnerability in defining risk, is used. The Z index method in a GIS environment is used to map the spatial extent of drought hazards. The key social and physical factors that define agricultural drought in the context of the Jinghe watershed are indentified and corresponding thematic maps are prepared. Risk is calculated by the integration of hazard and vulnerability. Results show that the risk gradient follows a north-south and west-east tendency and that agricultural droughts pose the highest risk to northern and northwestern sections of the Jinghe watershed.

Key words: agricultural drought, natural hazards, vulnerability, risk assessment, Jinghe watershed

龙鑫, 甄霖, 成升魁, 邸苏闯. 泾河流域农业旱灾风险定量评估及其空间特征[J]. 资源与生态学报, 2011, 2(4): 338-344.

LONG Xin, ZHEN Lin, CHENG Shengkui, DI Suchuang. Quantitative Assessment and Spatial Characteristics of Agricultural Drought Risk in the Jinghe Watershed, Northwestern China[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2011, 2(4): 338-344.

参考文献

Blaikie P M, T Cannon, I Davis, et al. 1994. At risk: natural hazards, people's vulnerability, and disasters. New York: Routledge.

Currey B. 1978. Mapping of areas liable to famine in Bangladesh. Ph. D. dissertation, Manoa, University of Hawaii.

Cutter S L. 1993. Living with risk: the geography of technological hazards. London: Edward Arnold.

Downing T E, K Bakker. 2000. Drought discourse and vulnerability. Chapter 45. In: Wilhite D A (ed.). Drought: A Global Assessment, Natural Hazards and Disasters Series. London: Routledge Publishers.

Etkin D, E Haque, L Bellisario, et al. 2004. An assessment of natural hazards and disasters in Canada. The Canadian natural hazards assessment project. Public safety and emergency preparedness Canada and environment Canada, Ottawa.

Gao Z Y. 2006. Development and action of irrigation in China. Journal of Economics of Water Resources, 24(1): 36-39, 82. (in Chinese)

Hutchinson M F. 2003. ANUSPLIN Version 4.3. Canberra, Australian National University Centre for Resource and Environmental Studies.

Jackson C I. 1991. Response strategies for the Great Plains: Canadian and U. S. perspectives. In: Wall G (Ed.). Symposium on the impacts of climatic change and variability on the Great Plains. Department of Geography Publication Series, Occasional Paper No. 12, University of Waterloo, 93- 103.

Kern J S. 1995. Geographic patterns of soil water-holding capacity in the contiguous United States. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J., 59: 1126-1133.

Klocke N L, G W Hergert. 1990. How soil holds water, NebGuide G90-964, INAR. Lincoln: University of Nebraska. Liu J Y, Buheaosier. 2000. Study on spatial-temporal feature of modern land-use change in China: using remote sensing techniques. Quaternary Sciences, 20(3): 229-239. (in Chinese)

Lockeretz W. 1981. The dust bowl: Its relevance to contemporary environmental problems. In: Lawson M P and M E Baker (Eds.). The Great Plains: Perspectives and prospects. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 11-31.

Opie J. 1989. 100 years of climate risk assessment on the High Plains: Which farm paradigm does irrigation serve? Agric. Hist., 63: 243-269.

Shi X M. 2006. Study on the agricultural geomorphology. Journal of Anhui Agri. Sci., 34 (20): 5314-5135, 5317. (in Chinese)

Tang H Y, Wang Z W, Shi J M, et al. 2009. Analysis of different dryness/ wetness index in Northwest China. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 27 (5): 6-11, 64. (in Chinese)

Turner B L II, Kasperson R E, Matson P A, et al. 2003. A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 100: 8074-8079.

Wilhelmi O V, D A Wilhite. 2002. Assessming vulnerability to agricultural drought: A Nebraska case study. Natural Hazards, 25: 37-58.

Wu J J, He B, Lu A F, et al. 2011. Quantitative assessment and spatial characteristics analysis of agricultural drought vulnerability in China.

Natural Hazards, 56: 785-801.

Yang X H, Yang X L. 2010. Aridity characteristics in East Gansu's Loess Plateau area based on Z index analysis. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 28(3): 248-253. (in Chinese)

Zhen L, Xie G D, Yang L, et al. 2005. Land-use change dynamics, driving forces and policy implications in Jinghe watershed of western China. Resources Science, 27 (4): 33-37. (in Chinese)

[1]	王雅俊, 钟丽芳. 生态系统脆弱性研究框架：测度、预测及风险评估[J]. 资源与生态学报, 2020, 11(5): 499-507.
[2]	李平星, 樊杰. 基于VSD模型的区域生态系统脆弱性评价——以广西西江经济带为例[J]. 资源与生态学报, 2014, 5(2): 163-170.
[3]	殷洁, 吴绍洪, 戴尔阜. 广东省台风灾害经济损失风险评估[J]. 资源与生态学报, 2012, 3(2): 144-150.
[4]	甄霖, 刘雪林, 魏云洁, 杨莉, 龙鑫, 杜秉贞, 李芬, 曹晓昌. 生态系统服务消耗：概念框架与中国西部案例[J]. 资源与生态学报, 2011, 2(4): 298-306.
[5]	徐中春, 吴绍洪, 戴尔阜, 李开忠. 中国地震灾害人口死亡风险定量评估[J]. 资源与生态学报, 2011, 2(1): 83-90.

泾河流域农业旱灾风险定量评估及其空间特征

Quantitative Assessment and Spatial Characteristics of Agricultural Drought Risk in the Jinghe Watershed, Northwestern China

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 5

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价